Floydie as usual, is all talks about drugs on Pacman, but, NO SHOW in Court Room! All he got to show was his false accusation NO Evidence...
that's why his loyal followers are so ******. they still don't get it that pbf is never going to fight pac. pbf will continue to find issues where there is none. his next demand most likely will be ost spies in pac's training camp. the guy is scared. fact that he's demanding these extra test means he can't believe pac is real. what else could it possibly mean? pac is right in suing the bastards.
but he beat Morales aswell, so dont discredit him for losing to him then not give the credit for beating him. the mosley fight was a joke, as was Marg granted. Hatton and Cotto were both game fighters who had only JUST passed their peak but I'd still say they were both on top of their game.
I'm not even a Pac fan, but you can argue points against him for his recent fights from Clottey to present day, but to completely discredit the guys achievements to back up your argument is ******
you're just one of many of NSB who has to resort to extremes when justifying a point
ok, so which prime champion did he beat??? and whats nsb???
I've always been a fan of Floyd since the 96 olympics. For him to offer to come out to FOB Salerno AKA "Rocket City" has made me more of a fan today, then I was yesterday. I will not entertain anymore questions about his courage, Rocket City aint no joke.
true, and im not one for dis*****g results but Pac beat him 3 years later, plus hes beaten Morales and Barrera. Those fights only get discredited now hes p4p no. 1.
a few years ago before he fought Diaz at 135, everyone loved the demolition jobs he did on the Mexican trio, but now hes a superstar, every win goes under the microscope and is judged that little bit more harshly, know what I mean?
for however much Barrera and Morales were past past their prime (and in my opinion, it wasnt by much) Pacquiao hadnt hit his prime, and was still inexperienced and a clumsy gung ho fighter that better technicians and more expereienced guys like MAB and Erik shouldve beaten
What I'm trying to say is dont discredit him entirely, because tbh I see it as two different Manny Pacquiaos : pre De La Hoya and post De La Hoya
and pre De La Hoya Manny is one of the most ferocious and quickest fighters Ive seen in my lifetime, he was devastating and overwhemled people
because he is p4p #1 . hatton wasnt, oscar wasnt, and shane wasnt.
oscar was not the #1 ranked jmw at the time, shane wasnt the #1 or 2 ranked ww at the time, and hatton before the fight took place, smart boxing fans knew he wasn't near floyds caliber. he struggled against collazo. and was moving up in weight. he still got credit for all those wins though and no one blames him for fighting those guys, what i do blame him for is retiring after the hatton fight, when he was in the most loaded division i have seen in a while, he had a undefeated cotto, a couple monsters in pwill and margs, not to mention shane , while he was more in his prime. he could have cleaned out a great division but the $ just wasnt worth the risk, and that wont fight top rank guys is complete bull ****, when it comes to $ or cementing your legacy you toss petty stuff like that aside.
Yes Shane Mosley was after he beat Antonio Margarito. Step your game up. Pac fought all of them guys after Floyd when they were on their way out for sure so what makes Pac so much greater than Floyd? Hatton struggled with Collazo because Collazo is a good fighter and while Hatton won the title sort of in a controversy. Hatton was undefeated and far more equipped mentally then he was against Pac. Floyd tried to fight Cotto and Margarito but Arum didn't want to make the Oscar fight because just like Arum does. He didn't want to do business with Oscar because he left him like Floyd did to Bob and Bob is still bitter. Cotto NEVER pushed hard to fight Floyd. Manny still hasn't fought any top fighters at WW. Floyd retired twice and still came back to fight better fighters on paper than Manny (Mosley 09/Ortiz)
Comment