Who has Muhammad Ali beating that makes people think he stand a chance against WK

[Easy-E]

i think you need to learn alot more about boxing.

end of thread

[KingKhan1]

oh dear, how can anyone call frazier a midget! in height maybe but i seriously doubt any heavyweight in this era could handle his left hook. And as for MA, you seriously need to re think that trail of thought! VK and WK couldnt have gone 3 rounds with MA.

[Spray_resistant]

oh dear, how can anyone call frazier a midget! in height maybe but i seriously doubt any heavyweight in this era could handle his left hook. And as for MA, you seriously need to re think that trail of thought! VK and WK couldnt have gone 3 rounds with MA.

How silly, he would have to resort to a Haye-like strategy or be ko'd.

[Miburo]

An obvious troll thread, and it still gets this many responses

[Champ Is Here]

hahahaha

Clay would have so beaten the brakes off Wlad

[cupocity303]

every single one of those guys wipes their ass with wlads resume. see what i did there?




so basically, you're trying to argue hypothetical with semantics.


wlad is dominating a watered down era. Fact.

Ali was the best in a golden age of heavyweights. Fact.

t

Apparently you're having trouble distinguishing fact from opinion, but that's ok.


The above quote to me is funny. The reason you say that the era Ali fought in was the Golden Age, is because he lost and people chose to upgrade his opponents status.

I love the argument that the Klitschko's have not fought "anyone". Isn't the truth actually that anyone they fight gets nowhere, in other words becomes a nobody. Imagine Frazier coming up and easily being beaten by Klitschko. No one would be talking talking about what a great fighter he is. This perception about how there were so many great fighters in the past (Golden Age as you called it) is merely due to the fact there was relative parity.

[-Kev-]

Who has Wlad beat that makes you think he could hold Ali's jockstrap? Haye? Chris Byrd? Sam Peter? These guys wouldn't even be Ali's sparring partners.

What's funny about that, it's that it's probably true.

[Mr. Fantastic]

I find it hilarious people are throwing a nerd rage on a fucking fantasy fight.

[cupocity303]

How do we know, because people from that era are HOF'ers, and no one besides the Klits will even be considered in the HOF.

This is intellectually dishonest. Think this through for a minute.

The reason anyone in that era becomes a Hall of Famer is because they defeated Ali. Frazier beats Ali, losses to him two more times, losses to Foreman. He gets into the Hall of Fame. Foreman becomes a Hall of Famer as a direct consequence of Ali losing, and Foreman ko'ing a smaller, weaker Heavyweight in Frazier, before losing to Ali.

RIght now, The Klitschko's have the Heavyweight division on lock. Nobody is getting through them. And thus, no Hall of Famers will be created. Do you want them to purposely lose, to put someone over and establish their credentials.

Like it would matter anyway, I'm sure the perception would just be that Wlad lost to a bum.

[etlux]

Who has Wlad beat that makes you think he could hold Ali's jockstrap? Haye? Chris Byrd? Sam Peter? These guys wouldn't even be Ali's sparring partners.

I think Wlad could kill Ali BUT it's just funny that the last part of your statement is sadly true ...it sounds like hyperbole but no really....Haye Chris Byrd and Sam Peter would seriously not even be good enough to be sparring partners for Ali. It's just funny how true that is LOL

But all in all, I think Wlad stands a chance to kill Ali, the size disparity is huge