Jim Dwyer is an idiot...period...
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
His pre and post Wlad-Haye videos are something to behold. He compares Haye to some of the greatest people throughout history (Gandhi included...somehow) and then in the post fight he blames the entire fight on Wlad, and then *****es about being bitter. I admit, I watch his videos. But I went from watching to hear a guy who used to be right break down fights, to now wanting to hear the Black version of Teddy Atlas spend 15 minutes calling a fight totally wrong in his breakdown. He cant even pick the obvious ones these days. His newest video calls for Ortiz to outbox Floyd if he expects to win. Seriously...Comment
-
Lol, I gotta see that.His pre and post Wlad-Haye videos are something to behold. He compares Haye to some of the greatest people throughout history (Gandhi included...somehow) and then in the post fight he blames the entire fight on Wlad, and then *****es about being bitter. I admit, I watch his videos. But I went from watching to hear a guy who used to be right break down fights, to now wanting to hear the Black version of Teddy Atlas spend 15 minutes calling a fight totally wrong in his breakdown. He cant even pick the obvious ones these days. His newest video calls for Ortiz to outbox Floyd if he expects to win. Seriously...
And yea Dwyer is too dumb to even describe.Comment
-
i really hate to say it as it is actually rude....but you asked....YES.How would you know? Wladimir hasn't fought anyone that made me think "Oh man he can beat Toney, and Tarver!" the only one close was a way past his prime Rahman. Until Wlad fights someone like Toney, or Tarver we'll never know. I don't consider his win over the great Samuel Peter to prove anything at all really.
I think Toney and Tarver would beat most of the HWs on Wlad's resume.
Am I still an idiot?Comment
-
I'be been reading all these posts from the last one to the first, and have reached this page. I was thinking all the time that you had been just joking, but this post of yours sounds as if you are actally serious. NO you cannot be. If you are there is a serious deficiency in your boxing sense somewhere.
And I do not mean to be rude but constructive. Seek help.Comment
-
Name 5 reasons why you think Wlad would beat Tarver. Tarver has more power than Wlad, has a better jab, and hes African American so he's way more slick.I'be been reading all these posts from the last one to the first, and have reached this page. I was thinking all the time that you had been just joking, but this post of yours sounds as if you are actally serious. NO you cannot be. If you are there is a serious deficiency in your boxing sense somewhere.
And I do not mean to be rude but constructive. Seek help.Comment
-
Just one little thing. If you are going to insist on embellishing your posts with a permanent quotation-the one from Robespierre- at least let it be a GENUINE one, and please...spell his name properly.
I suppose it is meant to be a joke, feeble enough as it is, since it was well known by Robespierre's contemporaries-those who were courageous enough to voice an opinion- that Robespierre had absolutely NO sense of humour.
I like it however.Comment

Comment