Jim Dwyer is an idiot...period...
Collapse
-
-
Whoa, lol, listen to the anger.... I wasn't talking about your mom now, was I? Are you related to Dwyer or Dwyer himself? My opinion is that Dwyer is an idiot, which he is obviously, if he thinks Hopkins and Tarver can beat Wlad. If you think that as well, then you are an idiot....OP you need to STFU. The man can have his own opinion just like you have your opinion and just like I have my opinion. If you think his opinion sucks that's fine, doesn't mean you have to make a scene about it and call him an idiot. That pretty much shows you're a huge attention whore.Comment
-
I just don't like you to be honest. Everytime I see you post it's always negative about someone else's opinion.Whoa, lol, listen to the anger.... I wasn't talking about your mom now, was I? Are you related to Dwyer or Dwyer himself? My opinion is that Dwyer is an idiot, which he is obviously, if he thinks Hopkins and Tarver can beat Wlad. If you think that as well, then you are an idiot....
Do I think Hopkins and Tarver can beat Wlad? Who knows. I didn't think Corrie Sanders or Lamon Brewster can beat Wlad. Anything is possible. Am I an idiot for believing that your god is beatable?Comment
-
He admitted he lost a bunch of money on the Green fight, he even said that it hurt. Based on his predictions in the last year, he must have lost a lot of money. That only supports my original point - Dwyer, idiot, if he was smart, he would stop ********, it's obviously not a skill he possesses.Comment
-
Beatable by Tarver or Hopkins?I just don't like you to be honest. Everytime I see you post it's always negative about someone else's opinion.
Do I think Hopkins and Tarver can beat Wlad? Who knows. I didn't think Corrie Sanders or Lamon Brewster can beat Wlad. Anything is possible. Am I an idiot for believing that your god is beatable?
He is beatable, but not by those two, Ray Charles can see that, and so should a professional gambler who bets his own money on fights.
So now you think Hopkins and Taver can do the same thing as Brewster or Sanders? LOL Sanders and Brewster would destroy either one of those even now. You must live in fantasy land just like Dwyer, if you think "anything is possible", no, it's not possible for Hopkins or Tarver to beat the Klitschkos. The only way they can ever beat them in a fight, any kind of fight, is if the Klitschkos get injured are physically incapable of fighting. However, that was not the reason given by Dwyer, he actually broke the fight down in his mind and compared Pavlik to Wlad.... LOL now that's an idiot...Comment
-
Comment
-
How would you know? Wladimir hasn't fought anyone that made me think "Oh man he can beat Toney, and Tarver!" the only one close was a way past his prime Rahman. Until Wlad fights someone like Toney, or Tarver we'll never know. I don't consider his win over the great Samuel Peter to prove anything at all really.Beatable by Tarver or Hopkins?
He is beatable, but not by those two, Ray Charles can see that, and so should a professional gambler who bets his own money on fights.
So now you think Hopkins and Taver can do the same thing as Brewster or Sanders? LOL Sanders and Brewster would destroy either one of those even now. You must live in fantasy land just like Dwyer, if you think "anything is possible", no, it's not possible for Hopkins or Tarver to beat the Klitschkos. The only way they can ever beat them in a fight, any kind of fight, is if the Klitschkos get injured are physically incapable of fighting. However, that was not the reason given by Dwyer, he actually broke the fight down in his mind and compared Pavlik to Wlad.... LOL now that's an idiot...
I think Toney and Tarver would beat most of the HWs on Wlad's resume.
Am I still an idiot?Comment
-
You are an even bigger idiot than I originally though... LOL Toney? Hold up, look at your post you idiot, you just owned yourself.How would you know? Wladimir hasn't fought anyone that made me think "Oh man he can beat Toney, and Tarver!" the only one close was a way past his prime Rahman. Until Wlad fights someone like Toney, or Tarver we'll never know. I don't consider his win over the great Samuel Peter to prove anything at all really.
I think Toney and Tarver would beat most of the HWs on Wlad's resume.
Am I still an idiot?
You talk about Toney as a great benchmark for Wlad? LOL You do know that Peter beat Toney twice, right? And Wlad owned Peter. Rahman? Toney couldn't get past Rahman, Wlad easily dispatched Rahman.
So let me see, you give Toney, Hopkins, and Tarver a chance to beat Wlad? LOL
Based on the fact that they are all 40+ or the fact that they were never HWs? Or perhaps the great fights those have had in the past 5 years?
Let me guess, you are AA, who still thinks that Ali would beat the boring robot brothers with both hands tied behind his back, do I have you pegged correctly?Comment
-
very true, if he keeps betting on his wrong predictions he will soon be living on the streets.
That Ortiz picture is great,i wish there was one with a Battered Ortiz face with "when i was nine i always knew i would quit against Marcos Maidana"?Comment

Comment