Jim Dwyer is an idiot...period...

[WladIsTheChamp]

You all know that Dwyer guy from YT, and his Gambler's Advisor **** predictions (although I was impressed with his Pirog/Jacobs prediction one time because he actually got the KO and the round prediction right).

Well not only did he pick Gayevid as a 50/50 fight, he also picked Green to beat Tarver by KO, then in the post-fight thread, after admitting how wrong his was, he now says that he gives both Tarver and Hopkins chances to trouble the Klitschkos. LOL!!!!

Tarver? Ok, first you pick against him with Green, now you are saying cause he beat Green he can beat the Klitschkos?!?

Hopkins? WTF?!?


Listen to his analysis, the most ******ed analysis I have ever heard. He said that just because Hopkins beat Pavlik, he has a chance to get "inside on Wlad" cause "Wlad can't fight inside". LOL! He is actually comparing Pavlik and Wlad.... other than skin color, they have NOTHING in common.


I know he is a Klitschko hater and all, and I know he has the race glasses on, but seriously? He is going to pick two 40 year olds, non-HWs, not even CWs, to beat an ATG HOF HW, who is the one of the most tecnically gifted and also happens to be one of the most powerful HW ever?

[Spray_resistant]

He is either spot on or way way off like with the Klitschko/Hopkins, Tarver thing. I enjoyed his commentary about Khan and Rios.

[John Barron]

he's spot on when he's not talking about black fighters. but what's the big fucking deal? he talks boxing and makes it clear in the beginning of every video that "the opinion you should follow is your own." he's not racist and tries to be professional when he speaks. he has his bias and so do you.

[uoykcuf]

I don't think that Green pick was a bad pick, yes Tarver owned Green but most expected that Green had an advantage since he was fighting much more often then Tarver who only had came out of retirement recently.

[WladIsTheChamp]

he's spot on when he's not talking about black fighters. but what's the big fucking deal? he talks boxing and makes it clear in the beginning of every video that "the opinion you should follow is your own." he's not racist and tries to be professional when he speaks. he has his bias and so do you.

So you think a guy who thinks of himself as a boxing pundit/analyst, picking Hopkins and Tarver to beat Wlad is not a total bonehead pick? It says that he is a total idiot who can't analyze a fighter's strengths and weaknesses or his judgment is blinded by bias.

[John Barron]

So you think a guy who thinks of himself as a boxing pundit/analyst, picking Hopkins and Tarver to beat Wlad is not a total bonehead pick? It says that he is a total idiot who can't analyze a fighter's strengths and weaknesses or his judgment is blinded by bias.

is he getting paid for hits on his youtube channel? probably not, why are you hustling over his opinion?

[Las Vegas,]

OP you need to STFU. The man can have his own opinion just like you have your opinion and just like I have my opinion. If you think his opinion sucks that's fine, doesn't mean you have to make a scene about it and call him an idiot. That pretty much shows you're a huge attention whore.

[NChristo]

He's fun to listen too I guess and can start some debates but I don't put any weight in to his words, used to listen to his predictions for the above reasons but since he said Pacquaio fights like Duran I haven't even bothered checking out any new videos, if he was the analyzing genius he is made out too be by quite a lot of people (Not by himself be it, he just gives his opinions and gives people the choice on to take it or not) then he wouldn't say anything like that, put me off.

[shenmue]

He was good with his predictions but in the last year or so he has been awful, He has got many badly wrong.

[John Barron]

He was good with his predictions but in the last year or so he has been awful, He has got many badly wrong.

his clothes deteriorate and his camera gets blurrier by the day. dude seems broke these days.