Why Ruiz Fans Notice Certain Things.

[marvdave]

Ruiz fans are just like any other people.
They use inductive and deductive reasoning to reach logical conclusions.

For those who might perhaps be unfamiliar with these methods:

Deductive reasoning is when you make a generalization about something and base your conclusion about something on that generalization.

Here is an example:

A longer reach provides distance fighting advantage.
Joe has the longer reach.
Joe has a distance fighting advantage.



Inductive reasoning is different in that it relies on observation of patterns. Patterns being a repetition of events. Then a generalization or conclusion is reached.

Here is an example:

The ref permitted one fighter to hit the other while the other was down.
The ref then permitted one fighter to hit the other behind the head.

The ref repeatedly warns only one fighter.

Conclusion or inductive leap:

This is biased ref.


Now this is the well-known and accepted way in which conclusions are reached in logic and in the sciences as well.


Unfortunately, when Ruiz fans use these established reasoning methods, some anti-Ruiz say that Ruiz fans are being illogical.

Instead of striving to explain the su****ious behavior that causes Ruiz fans to take notice, these Anti Ruiz fans choose to criticize them for noticing the su****ious behavior in the first place!!!!


In short, they take umbrage not really with the issues involved. They are actually taking umbrage with the principles of reasonung itself.

Which speaks volumes about the intellectual level at which some anti-Ruiz fans are functioning.


BTW

A person wishing not to be suspected must not act su****iously.
Otherwise su****ion will arise concerning the su****ious behavior.

I don't think we can use plural to describe the Ruiz fan.

[jabsRstiff]

Using ad hominem now huh?
Ummm, OK.

Professor?
I see you never attended college.
No thanx.
I don't qualify in the buffoonery department.
You might though.


Who would want to watch something they don't like?
I don't know?
Since you are one of the self-proclaimed weirdoes that does that, you tell me.

Sigh!
As I said before, don't like?
Don't watch.

Too profound for you?

Not boxing?
Ah Heh! Heh! Heh!
Ummmmmm, how come it not be boxing when Ruiz does it but it sho don be boxing when yo boy Ali don did it? Mmmmmmm?


Nady does what? Enforce rules?
Excuse a me but:

Sure, sure! Uhuh! uhhuh! Sure!

Like he enforced them in the recent Williams Vitali fight right?

Say what?

Skill?

English is obviously not your native tongue is it?
Look up the word in the dictionary and memorize its meaning. Otherwise you will continue to disgorge what the more knowledgeable on this site consider ignorance-derived drivel.



You know amigo. the more you try to act educated the more you remind me of a famous Spanish saying that goes like a so.

"El mono aunque lo vistan de seda, mono se queda."

BTW

I don't see you blaming the "refs" for not enforcing the rules in other fights. Ummmmm, why?

Also, I found a number of basic grammatical errors in your writing that I could very easily focus on. But since that is not the purpose of this forum, I won't.

"Also, I found a number of basic grammatical errors in your writing that I could very easily focus on."

Like ending a sentence with a preposition, perhaps ?

[Rocko]

In my haste I forget to punctuate sometimes.
Want proof?
Read your own example.

[Nautilus]

Rocko,

Did you just finish taking a logic class in a high school?

[jabsRstiff]

In my haste I forget to punctuate sometimes.
Want proof?
Read your own example.

Why so hasty ?
Patience is a sign of intelligence.

Considering how important it is for you to appear intelligent, you'd think you'd have considered this.

Don't worry, someone out there thinks you're nice & smart.

[marvdave]

Ruiz fans are just like any other people.
They use inductive and deductive reasoning to reach logical conclusions.

For those who might perhaps be unfamiliar with these methods:

Deductive reasoning is when you make a generalization about something and base your conclusion about something on that generalization.

Here is an example:

A longer reach provides distance fighting advantage.
Joe has the longer reach.
Joe has a distance fighting advantage.



Inductive reasoning is different in that it relies on observation of patterns. Patterns being a repetition of events. Then a generalization or conclusion is reached.

Here is an example:

The ref permitted one fighter to hit the other while the other was down.
The ref then permitted one fighter to hit the other behind the head.

The ref repeatedly warns only one fighter.

Conclusion or inductive leap:

This is biased ref.


Now this is the well-known and accepted way in which conclusions are reached in logic and in the sciences as well.


Unfortunately, when Ruiz fans use these established reasoning methods, some anti-Ruiz say that Ruiz fans are being illogical.

Instead of striving to explain the su****ious behavior that causes Ruiz fans to take notice, these Anti Ruiz fans choose to criticize them for noticing the su****ious behavior in the first place!!!!


In short, they take umbrage not really with the issues involved. They are actually taking umbrage with the principles of reasonung itself.

Which speaks volumes about the intellectual level at which some anti-Ruiz fans are functioning.


BTW

A person wishing not to be suspected must not act su****iously.
Otherwise su****ion will arise concerning the su****ious behavior.

professor,

could I get a copy of the cliff notes on this one?

In the future, please talk down, so I can understand.

[Nautilus]

Don't worry, someone out there thinks you're nice & smart.

Would that be Ruiz?

[jabsRstiff]

Would that be Ruiz?

Even Ruiz is embarrassed by this joke of a human.

[marvdave]

professor,

could I get a copy of the cliff notes on this one?

In the future, please talk down, so I can understand.

and furthermore....I flunked English in High School, so please don't make fun of my grammer. I'm very touchy about that.

[scap]

Hey Rocko my man...

Explain yourself...not a history lesson or a bunch of rhetorical ****...explain? Are you a Ruiz fan? Are you a boxing fan? Are you a college professor? What is your purpose?

You make the case that Ruiz does what every other fighter does he simply gets slammed by the fans when he does it? Elaborate...

Is Ruiz really your guy and if so why? This is what this forum is about, make your case and as Jab put it earlier there are a lot better ways to make it than to go into the rant you went into in the opening post.

Your obviously a smart guy, your education is obviously up to par that I am sure of...are you a boxing guy...that Im not so sure of?