Pacquiao more accurate puncher than Mayweather

[Light_Speed]

Jabs dont count lol, All time great thread...

And that's why TS can't be taken seriously.

[BoxingGenius27]

Here, let me compare Pac's punching accuaracy in his first 6 fights to Mayweather's first 6 fights and see what I get.

Or maybe I'll compare Pac's 12th - 17th fight to Mayweather's 12th - 17th fight and see what I get lol

Give it up, Pac isn't the more accurate puncher.

[Vadrigar.]

Welcome to...

[IMG]http://i55.***********.com/albums/g137/titodasav/f6515205.jpg[/IMG]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[D4thincarnation]

Here, let me compare Pac's punching accuaracy in his first 6 fights to Mayweather's first 6 fights and see what I get.

Or maybe I'll compare Pac's 12th - 17th fight to Mayweather's 12th - 17th fight and see what I get lol

Give it up, Pac isn't the more accurate puncher.

That will tell you who was more accurate at certain times in their careers.

I wanted to find out who was the most accurate now.

And that person is Pacquiao.

[tranquilo]

If only it would have helped last November.

[chike99]

It didn't backfire, I knew that "the myth" of Floyd's accuracy compared to Pacquiao's existed and I knew people heard it many time without actually looking at the figures or even taking not how each fighter fights.

I knew most people would find it difficult to shift their beliefs especially when I'm telling them the opposite of what they have been told.

But I knew that Mayweather would accuracy would come down a lot las night and maybe then some more people could see the truth.

Typical Pacta*d. You are trying to make "more people see the truth" using an incorrect calculation. The Gambler showed you the correct way to calculate connect percentage over a series of fights but like a typical inflexible Pacta*d you will not accept that the method you used was incorrect. If you cannot do simple math I suggest you go back to elementary school and stay there.

[BoxingGenius27]

That will tell you who was more accurate at certain times in their careers.

I wanted to find out who was the most accurate now.

And that person is Pacquiao.

Is that counting jabs or not counting jabs lol

[D4thincarnation]

If only it would have helped last November.

Pacquiao landed 43% against a great counter puncher who knows Pacquiao's game very well.

[D4thincarnation]

Typical Pacta*d. You are trying to make "more people see the truth" using an incorrect calculation. The Gambler showed you the correct way to calculate connect percentage over a series of fights but like a typical inflexible Pacta*d you will not accept that the method you used was incorrect. If you cannot do simple math I suggest you go back to elementary school and stay there.

Tell that to compubox, they use the same method I do, fool.

[D4thincarnation]

Is that counting jabs or not counting jabs lol

Ok you are a boxing genius, tell us what a jab is used for in boxing?