Pacquiao more accurate puncher than Mayweather

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Gambler1981
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2008
    • 25961
    • 520
    • 774
    • 49,039

    #551
    That isn't very scientific because averages don't work like that~

    Comment

    • Ray*
      Be safe!!!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 44867
      • 1,654
      • 1,608
      • 558,890

      #552
      Jabs dont count lol, All time great thread...

      Comment

      • D4thincarnation
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 16198
        • 533
        • 260
        • 133,240

        #553
        Originally posted by The Gambler1981
        That isn't very scientific because averages don't work like that~
        Thats is exactly how they work.

        I used the mean average for their past six fights. That is adding up their connect percentage for each fight and dividing it by 6.

        And the proof was in the pudding last night, it is clear who is the more accurate puncher now.

        Comment

        • The Gambler1981
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2008
          • 25961
          • 520
          • 774
          • 49,039

          #554
          Originally posted by D4thincarnation
          Thats is exactly how they work.

          I used the mean average for their past six fights. That is adding up their connect percentage for each fight and dividing it by 6.

          And the proof was in the pudding last night, it is clear who is the more accurate puncher now.
          You really want a math lesson don't you~


          That is not their actual average for punches landed, it is a flawed statistic.

          For example not looking at the real numbers just using some basic ones

          Say a guy lands 70%, 30% and 50%

          He land 70% out of 200 (like in an early knock out)

          30% out of 1200 (like in a fight where he outworked another guy)

          And then land 50% out of 750 (like in a fight where he landed well but had his output limited)

          You are saying that guy lands 50%

          140+360+375=875
          200+1200+750=2150

          Now I should not have to go on because even a simpleton should realize 875 isn't half of 2150 but I will go on~

          875/2150= .407 or 41% if you want to be nice with rounding~
          Last edited by The Gambler1981; 05-06-2012, 03:20 PM.

          Comment

          • stilltharow
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 666
            • 55
            • 10
            • 7,789

            #555
            and your point is? do you want a medal ? who cares

            Comment

            • D4thincarnation
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 16198
              • 533
              • 260
              • 133,240

              #556
              Originally posted by The Gambler1981
              You really want a math lesson don't you~


              That is not their actual average for punches landed, it is a flawed statistic.

              For example not looking at the real numbers just using some basic ones

              Say a guy lands 70%, 30% and 50%

              He land 70% out of 200 (like in an early knock out)

              30% out of 1200 (like in a fight where he outworked another guy)

              And then land 50% out of 750 (like in a fight where he landed well but had his output limited)

              You are saying that guy lands 50%

              140+360+375=875
              200+1200+750=2150

              Now I should not have to go on because even a simpleton should realize 875 isn't half of 2150 but I will go on~

              875/2150= .407 or 41% if you want to be nice with rounding~

              So you would penalise I guy for KOing someone, and reward someone for picking some off in the latter round when their opponent can hardly hold their guard up.

              Let me guess you never made this point for that statisic about Floyd' +/- connects numbers.

              I wonder why?


              Pacquiao is much the more accurate puncher. Cotto agrees

              Comment

              • D4thincarnation
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2011
                • 16198
                • 533
                • 260
                • 133,240

                #557
                Originally posted by stilltharow
                and your point is? do you want a medal ? who cares
                The point is Pacquiao is the more accurate puncher, but some believe Floyd is some kind of sharp shooting genius that hardly misses and Pacquiao just throws loads of punches and a few land.


                Dispelling the myths.

                Comment

                • The Gambler1981
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 25961
                  • 520
                  • 774
                  • 49,039

                  #558
                  Originally posted by D4thincarnation
                  So you would penalise I guy for KOing someone, and reward someone for picking some off in the latter round when their opponent can hardly hold their guard up.

                  Let me guess you never made this point for that statisic about Floyd' +/- connects numbers.

                  I wonder why?


                  Pacquiao is much the more accurate puncher. Cotto agrees
                  I didn't make this thread~ I didn't bump this thread. I don't really use +/- as any sort of basis of anything.

                  This is about accuracy overall, total numbers matter because the larger the sample the more telling the numbers~

                  I like my stats to be based on reality, not wishful thinking.

                  Comment

                  • tranquilo
                    Banned
                    • Apr 2012
                    • 1026
                    • 61
                    • 44
                    • 1,244

                    #559
                    Talk about your own thread backfiring on you.

                    I don't blame them, these hardcore fanboys don't know any better.

                    Comment

                    • D4thincarnation
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 16198
                      • 533
                      • 260
                      • 133,240

                      #560
                      Originally posted by Antagonist
                      Talk about your own thread backfiring on you.

                      I don't blame them, these hardcore fanboys don't know any better.

                      It didn't backfire, I knew that "the myth" of Floyd's accuracy compared to Pacquiao's existed and I knew people heard it many time without actually looking at the figures or even taking not how each fighter fights.

                      I knew most people would find it difficult to shift their beliefs especially when I'm telling them the opposite of what they have been told.

                      But I knew that Mayweather would accuracy would come down a lot las night and maybe then some more people could see the truth.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP