Lennox vs Vitali..... The numbers clearly show

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jimmy1569
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2005
    • 2920
    • 114
    • 0
    • 3,083

    #1

    Lennox vs Vitali..... The numbers clearly show

    who the more dominant fighter was/is

    Lennox = 44 fights 41 w's 2 l's one draw >>> 94.3% winning percentage
    32 KO'S = 72.7 KO %
    225 RDS to complete his fights = 5.11 rds per bout
    approximate rds lost = 4 DOZEN (INCLUDING 4 OF 6 TO HIS SUPERIOR)


    Vitali = 44 fights 42 w's 2 l's >>> 95.4% winning percentage
    39 KO'S = 88.6 % KO %(HEAVYWEIGHT BOXING RECORD)
    209 RDS to complete his fights = 4.75 rds per bout..
    approximate rds lost = a dozen (BOXING RECORD ALL WEIGHT CLASSES)

    Now i ask how is Lennox the better fighter with the better resume when both have been in the ring 44 times in there career & Vitali utterly destroys him in every category including being down on the canvas & knocked out by one punch 2 less times than him.

    Lennox has a victory over Vitali & still has the inferior winning percentage. The myth that Lennox is somehow better than Vitali is just that. You can talk about the comp all you want but at the end of the day that's just a matter of opinion>>> you want actual facts.. you came to the right place!
  • RespekonMyName
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 2795
    • 240
    • 12
    • 24,643

    #2
    Lewis TKO6 Klitschko. That's a fact!

    Comment

    • MrTwain
      Up and Comer
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • May 2011
      • 44
      • 4
      • 0
      • 6,074

      #3
      Originally posted by jimmy1569
      Now i ask how is Lennox the better fighter with the better resume when both have been in the ring 44 times in there career & Vitali utterly destroys him in every category including being down on the canvas & knocked out by one punch 2 less times than him.
      yes sir, lennox is the better boxer. just compare the opponents both fought...

      Comment

      • JAB5239
        Dallas Cowboys
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 28382
        • 5,406
        • 4,531
        • 73,018

        #4
        Originally posted by jimmy1569
        who the more dominant fighter was/is

        Lennox = 44 fights 41 w's 2 l's one draw >>> 94.3% winning percentage
        32 KO'S = 72.7 KO %
        225 RDS to complete his fights = 5.11 rds per bout
        approximate rds lost = 4 DOZEN (INCLUDING 4 OF 6 TO HIS SUPERIOR)


        Vitali = 44 fights 42 w's 2 l's >>> 95.4% winning percentage
        39 KO'S = 88.6 % KO %(HEAVYWEIGHT BOXING RECORD)
        209 RDS to complete his fights = 4.75 rds per bout..
        approximate rds lost = a dozen (BOXING RECORD ALL WEIGHT CLASSES)

        Now i ask how is Lennox the better fighter with the better resume when both have been in the ring 44 times in there career & Vitali utterly destroys him in every category including being down on the canvas & knocked out by one punch 2 less times than him.

        Lennox has a victory over Vitali & still has the inferior winning percentage. The myth that Lennox is somehow better than Vitali is just that. You can talk about the comp all you want but at the end of the day that's just a matter of opinion>>> you want actual facts.. you came to the right place!
        Lennox fought a much better quality of opposition and stopped Votaly when he was past his best and Vitaly was prime. Lewis over Vitaly.....end of story.

        Comment

        • Larry the boss
          EDUCATED
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 90798
          • 6,419
          • 4,473
          • 2,500,480

          #5
          Lewis stopped vitali head to head and has a better resume..vitalis NEVER BEEN A UNIFIED CHAMP.lewis has






          Comment

          • jimmy1569
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2005
            • 2920
            • 114
            • 0
            • 3,083

            #6
            Originally posted by MrTwain
            yes sir, lennox is the better boxer. just compare the opponents both fought...
            Well since I don't think they've ever faced a common opponent other than each other.... Vitali winning 2/3 of there bout is all one can go on when speaking about competition.. They both have had 44 fights with varying opponents.. it's what you do to whomever they put in the ring with you that pays your bills at the end of the day. The FACTS state Vitali did it much better across the board.

            Comment

            • MrTwain
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • May 2011
              • 44
              • 4
              • 0
              • 6,074

              #7
              who do you think faced better opponents, vitali or lennox?

              Comment

              • jimmy1569
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2005
                • 2920
                • 114
                • 0
                • 3,083

                #8
                Originally posted by LarryX2011
                Lewis stopped vitali head to head and has a better resume..vitalis NEVER BEEN A UNIFIED CHAMP.lewis has






                The faCTS state that both have won portions of a belt 3 times with the difference being that Vitali NEVER RETIRED by giving away 3 belts in succession rather than fighting A long term reigning champ each time.

                Comment

                • Larry the boss
                  EDUCATED
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 90798
                  • 6,419
                  • 4,473
                  • 2,500,480

                  #9
                  vitalis resume isnt even better than wlads

                  Comment

                  • Larry the boss
                    EDUCATED
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 90798
                    • 6,419
                    • 4,473
                    • 2,500,480

                    #10
                    Originally posted by jimmy1569
                    The faCTS state that both have won portions of a belt 3 times with the difference being that Vitali NEVER RETIRED by giving away 3 belts in succession rather than fighting A long term reigning champ each time.
                    vitali LOST to byrd thus losing his belt..he retired himself 2 times..once against byrd and once when he retired thus losing his belt again

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP