do you give floyd credit for dominating jmm like no 1's ever done?

[Chups]

Unfortunately for you, that doesn't explain away those incredible ****ty, nonsensical examples you used

To you it's ****ty coz everything you have is ****ty......you can't even afford a PPV fight.....lol.


They all have multiple defenses.....the same with Norris. Take out SRL's name in there and they are all EXACTLY the same------> A champ who had defenses with nobodies.

[Chups]

Yes, like Duran was for Joppy. Oh wait.

Or ALI with Holmes...oh wait.



Ahahahahaha!!

[IMDAZED]

To you it's ****ty coz everything you have is ****ty......you can't even afford a PPV fight.....lol.


They all have multiple defenses.....the same with Norris. Take out SRL's name in there and they are all EXACTLY the same------> A champ who had defenses with nobodies.

Oh wow.

See...this is why I say...let those who know boxing...talk boxing.

Norris isn't an ATG. But to argue that he made a bunch of defenses against nobodies means you either a. Didn't follow the sport or B. Didn't follow the sport. Norris was ranked #3 pound for pound for years, behind Pea and Chavez. Can you say that about any of the other fighters you mentioned? No. Know why? Take a guess, sweetheart.

[IronDanHamza]

Or ALI with Holmes...oh wait.



Ahahahahaha!!

But Homles being inducted into the HOF has nothing to do with the fact he beat Ali. It really doesn't.

Homles is an ATG HW without Ali.

[IMDAZED]

Or ALI with Holmes...oh wait.



Ahahahahaha!!

What point are you trying to make here? You think Holmes got in because he beat Ali? Do you follow boxing at all?

[johncods]

Mayweather had a definitive size advantage on JMM. And it was JMM's 1st fight there.

[IronDanHamza]

Oh wow.

See...this is why I say...let those who know boxing...talk boxing.

Norris isn't an ATG. But to argue that he made a bunch of defenses against nobodies means you either a. Didn't follow the sport or B. Didn't follow the sport. Norris was ranked #3 pound for pound for years, behind Pea and Chavez. Can you say that about any of the other fighters you mentioned? No. Know why? Take a guess, sweetheart.

Was about to touch on his P4P ranking.

You really can't compare Norris' title defences to those guys.

Those guys don't have the Simon Browns, Meldrik Taylors or John Mugabi's that Norris had. (along with others)

Although Taylor and Mugabi were in decline they were still solid wins for Norris which those names listed lack in general.

[waxfondler]

Why would a lightweight (135lb) need to gain 20lbs to fight at 144?

my bad on that bro, my minds gone. i meant 10-ish

Burt Sugar didn't seem to know. At least, until AFTER the fight was over. Before it, he thought it was a good matchup.

although i view bert sugar as one of the most credible guys, he tends to flip flop... MAJORITY of boxing types recognized it as a one-sided match... a lot of people were rooting for jmm, but nobody REALLY thought he could handle floyd

[IMDAZED]

Was about to touch on his P4P ranking.

You really can't compare Norris' title defences to those guys.

Those guys don't have the Simon Browns, Meldrik Taylors or John Mugabi's that Norris had. (along with others)

Although Taylor and Mugabi were in decline they were still solid wins for Norris which those names listed lack in general.

Agreed. Mugabi was a shell and Taylor...well, you already know. But guys like Vaden, Pettway, etc. Very, very solid.

[Chups]

Oh wow.

See...this is why I say...let those who know boxing...talk boxing.

Norris isn't an ATG. But to argue that he made a bunch of defenses against nobodies means you either a. Didn't follow the sport or B. Didn't follow the sport. Norris was ranked #3 pound for pound for years, behind Pea and Chavez. Can you say that about any of the other fighters you mentioned? No. Know why? Take a guess, sweetheart.

You're just picking up a few pieces of achievements to prove your point. There are alot of fighters who was ranked number 2 or 3 P4P that did not make it to the HOF. I thought P4P is just an opinion or popularity contest....suddenly it's a mandatory for the HOF??

Let me do what you did.

How many defenses did Norris do? 9 or 10?
1.Those I listed had 20, 17 and 20+ defenses. Can you say that about Norris?
No. Know why? Take a guess, fronter.

How many losses did Norris have........is it less that those I listed? No. Know why? Take a guess, fronter.