James DeGale, post-fight presser;

[IronDanHamza]

2-0 IS 2-0 mate, what isn't sinking in with you people?

Because one of them was in the Am's?

Who cares if it's 2-0 anyway? The fight was close. Have a rematch. Why not?

[PRINCE O' PROSE]

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Hop/Pascal was close, I was merely using it as an example that a 3rd match isn't needed, 2-0 (or 1 and a draw in that case) is 2-0, DeGale has had 2 chances to beat Groves and failed both. His problem, not Groves'.

Ohhh, you're counting the ams.


What happened in the ams isn't relevant to what should happen here in the pros. You don't use a five year old am fight to determine whether two pros who just had a close fight should rematch or not.


In the ams, Tommy Hearns could barely punch his way out of a paper bag.

[J.R]

Barrera-Morales, Pacquiao-Marquez, Norton-Ali, Ali-Frazier, Bowe-Holyfield.


These two aren't on that level, but they are fierce rivals who shared a close fight in full public view. The notion of a rematch is a long way from irrelevant at this point in time.

Because one of them was in the Am's?

Who cares if it's 2-0 anyway? The fight was close. Have a rematch. Why not?

I'm sure they will rematch, boys. But right now, Groves has nothing to prove.

[J.R]

Ohhh, you're counting the ams.


What happened in the ams isn't relevant to what should happen here in the pros.


In the ams, Tommy Hearns could barely punch his way out of a paper bag.

Loooool but you know what I'm saying don't you, for these two, personally, 2-0 is what it is. Whether it's official or not. And that will eat DeGale up. so why should Groves rematch him, after all it'd be Groves now giving DEGALE a pay day......

[J.R]

Anyway, I'm off to bed. What's done is done, I enjoy chatting with you looooool, but I will defend Groves on this one.

Speak tomorrow after work.

[War-Robbo]

I'm sure they will rematch, boys. But right now, Groves has nothing to prove.

Yeah they should do right away because the decisn isn't clear, Groves knows deep down he didn't win that fight. But if he is so confident and mouthing off after the fight why doesn't he prove it again, controversial decision so why doesn't George prove he really can beat James by dominating him?? He can't thats why but you know James could dominate him as he showed last night by outclassing him at times.....

[PRINCE O' PROSE]

Personally, I enjoyed the size of event we got last night (all over two unproven domestic prospects, LMAO) and I'd like to see it again. It was fun.

A second fight would be even more hotly anticipated and would probably surpass the first (which was pretty tasty) in terms of action.

Who wouldn't want to see them do it again?

[J.R]

Yeah they should do right away because the decisn isn't clear, Groves knows deep down he didn't win that fight. But if he is so confident and mouthing off after the fight why doesn't he prove it again, controversial decision so why doesn't George prove he really can beat James by dominating him?? He can't thats why but you know James could dominate him as he showed last night by outclassing him at times.....

Precisely, you're asking for it again. How many 'agains' will Groves have to do it before you admit - DeGale can't win!!!

[War-Robbo]

Personally, I enjoyed the size of event we got last night (all over two unproven domestic prospects, LMAO) and I'd like to see it again. It was fun.

A second fight would be even more hotly anticipated and would probably surpass the first (which was pretty tasty) in terms of action.

Who wouldn't want to see them do it again?

After that wank decision they have to do it again but we all know Groves will be too scared to rematch James. We will have to wait until Chunky's world champion and Groves is calling him out again for a payday!!!

[project xxx1]

frank warren = ****...........

degale will bounce back,groves shouldnt give him a rematch,let him burn