James DeGale, post-fight presser;

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • War-Robbo
    Interim Champion
    • Mar 2011
    • 692
    • 15
    • 0
    • 6,802

    #31
    Originally posted by iJohn Locke
    Precisely, you're asking for it again. How many 'agains' will Groves have to do it before you admit - DeGale can't win!!!
    When i watch one of their fights and think Groves was a clear winner, If Degale won that fight last night i would have still been saying have a rematch so Degale could really prove how much better he is......

    Comment

    • PRINCE O' PROSE
      Banned
      • May 2011
      • 629
      • 76
      • 43
      • 733

      #32
      LOL, I'm sure it's eating DeGale up. He talked big and looks like an overconfident **** now.

      BUT, the rematch just seems like a no-brainer.

      Both guys would be looking to raise their levels from the first encounter, for different reasons. The 2nd fight would probably be even better in quality terms.

      It just makes sense.

      Comment

      • .G.
        Banned
        • Apr 2011
        • 413
        • 42
        • 33
        • 621

        #33
        stop picking your nose you dirty little shit

        Comment

        • PRINCE O' PROSE
          Banned
          • May 2011
          • 629
          • 76
          • 43
          • 733

          #34
          Originally posted by project xxx1
          frank warren = ****...........

          degale will bounce back,groves shouldnt give him a rematch,let him burn
          LOOOL, I have a feeling they might (let him burn, that is).



          Cagey lot, that Hayemaker bunch.

          Comment

          • project xxx1
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jul 2009
            • 12868
            • 764
            • 1,289
            • 22,511

            #35
            Originally posted by PRINCE O' PROSE
            LOOOL, I have a feeling they might (let him burn, that is).
            if someone talked so much **** before the fight and then i beat him,i would let him burn and wouldnt give a rematch either

            degale is lucky groves is a nice classy guy,i would be making youtube vids winding him up all day long

            Comment

            • SpitBalla
              Banned
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Feb 2011
              • 840
              • 46
              • 0
              • 951

              #36
              Originally posted by iJohn Locke
              It's irrelevant already in my eyes. He has no more to prove, he was the OVERWHELMING under-dog, yet won and it's now 2-0. People are still saying DeGale can beat him.

              Example, Hopkins vs Pascal, it's one draw and one win in Hopkins favour, are people saying Pascal could still win and a rematch is needed? No.

              Amateur or not, personally for them it's 2-0 to Groves, DeGale's ego can't handle that. But his fans will just have to.

              It's over.
              I agree with you, DeGale had his shot and came up short, hey should he be entitled to more?

              If Chunky won, would he give Groves a rematch? Hell no, so I don't see why Groves has to give one.

              Comment

              • IRISH LULLABY
                Banned
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Dec 2010
                • 349
                • 37
                • 30
                • 465

                #37
                This fight was reasonably close, a possible rematch doesn't seem so fat-fetched with the potential that a second bout in this rivalry could be just as marketable and lucrative. DeGale would definitely display more aggression than he exhibited in this fight, so it would also hold the capability of being a more exciting affair.

                DeGale is capable of defeating Groves a couple times in a fight series, he just needs a higher quality of preparation, a more suitable fight strategy and a much more aggressive, assertive mentality in the ring.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP