It's irrelevant already in my eyes. He has no more to prove, he was the OVERWHELMING under-dog, yet won and it's now 2-0. People are still saying DeGale can beat him.
Example, Hopkins vs Pascal, it's one draw and one win in Hopkins favour, are people saying Pascal could still win and a rematch is needed? No.
Amateur or not, personally for them it's 2-0 to Groves, DeGale's ego can't handle that. But his fans will just have to.
It's over.
Example, Hopkins vs Pascal, it's one draw and one win in Hopkins favour, are people saying Pascal could still win and a rematch is needed? No.
Amateur or not, personally for them it's 2-0 to Groves, DeGale's ego can't handle that. But his fans will just have to.
It's over.

Comment