Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who has the better resume Sugar Ray Leonard or Manny Pacquiao?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Leonard bro. They were just better fighters back then.

    Comment


    • uh, ray leonard. obviously.

      Comment


      • I can't believe I read through this whole thread at one time, I tried but had to stop after a few pages this time. This thread is a classic though, lol

        Comment


        • Originally posted by hhs661 View Post
          Manny Pacman Pacquiao is a congressman who's all natural and an 8 division champion. He's destroyed the likes of DLH, Hatton, Margarito, Cotto and David Diaz like no other. OF COURSE SRL isn't seeing his resume. No one in the history of boxing is. Ali wishes he could be what Manny is today. SRR who? no footage of him in his prime cause he never had one. Manny Pacman Pacquiao is the GOAT!!!!!!!! I pray for the Manny haters

          Comment


          • I'm a PACMAN fan, NO BS but for me PAC has better resume than SRL. PAC is more dominating or can even knock SRL out if they ever fought. PAC's opponents are better than SRL opponents.

            Comment


            • Well no great ducked Sugar Ray Leonard like Mayweather is ducking Pacquiao.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                Dont be silly now. Beating a great lightweight and over rated weight drained Hearns and past it hagler dont mean you have a resume comparable to Pac. SRLs is very good but a little perspective is needed.

                No historian worth his salt thinks SRL has a better resume than Pac.
                By far the dumbest post I've ever read.

                Comment


                • Not sure if I've posted on this but SRL of course!! Having said that, Manny's resume is deeper and his career has more longevity.

                  Quality > Quantity though

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Since 1985 View Post
                    Obviously it's easily Leonard, Pacquiao has never beaten anyone nearly as good as Hearns, Hagler, Benitez, Duran, etc.
                    Why making a thread when you have an obvious answer? Of course it was Leonard but we know this is not the your real intention. Your real intention was to sugar coat the undefeated coward because your boy despite of he is undefeated his lame resume is not even close comparable to this guy with 3 ko losses.

                    Now back to the topic. Leonard has better resume but accomplishments? LMAO! Pac 3 in 1 records (8 weight divisions titles, 4 lineal titles and Fighter of the Decade) will never be achieved by one person and will never be broken for many generations to come. The closest person to do it right now is Floyd but since he admitted he is a coward and his health must comes first. I don't think he has a balls to fight Golovkin at middleweight, Ward at Super middleweight and some bum at light heavyweight at catchweight just to make it even what Pac did accomplished. Calling all the floydiots. It's sound so easy right? Now ask your boy to do it.
                    Last edited by straightleft; 05-15-2014, 06:11 AM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                      The hagler fight was pick em and SRL spluttered and wasnt dominant. I dont think SRL would dominate Pacs opponents like Pac did. Thats why after Pac destroyed Margarito people were saying its quite possible Pac is the GOAT now. They couldnt visualize SRL or Duran do those things.

                      On the other hand, most people can see Pac would be favoured of beating Duran, Benitez, and Hearns as well.
                      Hilarious! And on the 1st page of the thread too.

                      Par for NSB
                      Last edited by ATG Fighter; 05-15-2014, 03:05 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP