Who has the better resume Sugar Ray Leonard or Manny Pacquiao?

[puga]

Why not???

i thought you were a boxing expert?.....

[AllEyesOpen]

i thought you were a boxing expert?.....

clearly, you are not.

I don't know why people bother to discuss this with you when clearly your opinion is blinded by your biased.

[jrosales13]

i thought you were a boxing expert?.....

Why did you think that?

I'm no boxing expert at all.

Anyways, why aren't they better wins?

[optkliluzn]

I think its pretty even but in the next year or so Pacquiao will have a better resume if he continues to box, I mean Hearns and Hagler and Duran are legends but Benetiz really? he was like 30 something and 0 when he went against Leonard but after Leonard his career took a dive to something like 19 wins and 7 losses. Now Pacquaio has Cotto, Hatton, Marquez, morales and Barrera and those name will all be hall of famers

Obviously it's easily Leonard, Pacquiao has never beaten anyone nearly as good as Hearns, Hagler, Benitez, Duran, etc.

[jrosales13]

I think its pretty even but in the next year or so Pacquiao will have a better resume if he continues to box, I mean Hearns and Hagler and Duran are legends but Benetiz really? he was like 30 something and 0 when he went against Leonard but after Leonard his career took a dive to something like 19 wins and 7 losses. Now Pacquaio has Cotto, Hatton, Marquez, morales and Barrera and those name will all be hall of famers

Benitez>>>>>every single guy you just named for Pac.

[lefthook2daliva]

This thread is still here?

Wow.

Ok.

Marvelous Marvin Hagler is better than anybody on Pacs resume as is Roberto Duran and even Tommy Hearns. Those three guys are better wins than any JMM, MAB or EM or DLH (emaciated as he was or even in his badassest prime) or Cotto or Margarito.

What's not to understand here?

[Twako]

This thread is still here?

Wow.

Ok.

Marvelous Marvin Hagler is better than anybody on Pacs resume as is Roberto Duran and even Tommy Hearns. Those three guys are better wins than any JMM, MAB or EM or DLH (emaciated as he was or even in his badassest prime) or Cotto or Margarito.

What's not to understand here?

name-wise on a resume? SRL tops it. ATG'ness? it evens out. PAC's HOFers in the lower weights plus his dominance over bigger men of caliber balances it out.

[Lineal Champ]

SRL by far.

But it aint Pacs fault boxing has less athletes willing to take up the sport, so less competition. Oh well they dont make em like they used to

[jrosales13]

name-wise on a resume? SRL tops it. ATG'ness? it evens out. PAC's HOFers in the lower weights plus his dominance over bigger men of caliber balances it out.

No it does not balances it out.

And, Pac only has 4 sure fire HOF'ers in Barrera, Morales, JMM, and Oscar. Cotto is a borderline HOF'er that might get in, might not.

But, more importantly than who is when.

So going by is not who but when. SRL>>>>>>>>Pac in terms of greatness and is not even debatable.

[puga]

clearly, you are not.

I don't know why people bother to discuss this with you when clearly your opinion is blinded by your biased.

and who is you?...lol

Why did you think that?

I'm no boxing expert at all.

Anyways, why aren't they better wins?

i thought you said theres no point of discussing with me ...ive stated it many times in this thread... why dont you read though it...if you really want a discusion now, why dont state why you think it is.......