I don't see how Pac can be rated over Ray Leonard. Even if he beat Mayweather, I think it's still clearly Leonard.
Who has the better resume Sugar Ray Leonard or Manny Pacquiao?
Collapse
-
does pac have a garbage fight at ww mofo?....stop pretending to be a pacfan mofo...No it does not
And, beating rank WWs don't really mean much. I mean Zaveck is a rank WW. Is that suppose to be impressive?
I mean if Leonard fought in a garbage cruiserweight division and beat a weak ranked CW. Is not surpass a win over say Benitez or Duran because the CW would have been bigger. You see what I'm saying?
you act as if srl leanrd never fought for a garbage ass titles..he actaully has two titles thats bs..Comment
-
He fought in an era where there were hardly any mexican, rican, asian or other latino fighters in the lower weights. Added to that blacks were heavily discriminated against.
Pacquiao is the lineal champ at 4 weights and ranked #1 at welterweight currently. Also rated #2 at 122 and #3 at 135. He got offered a fight with De La Hoya and MAB moved up which is why hes not the #1 guy at those weights. So stop this 1 of 4 BS. It doesnt help your argument at all.Comment
-
He fought in an era where there were hardly any mexican, rican, asian or other latino fighters in the lower weights. Added to that blacks were heavily discriminated against.
Pacquiao is the lineal champ at 4 weights and ranked #1 at welterweight currently. Also rated #2 at 122 and #3 at 135. He got offered a fight with De La Hoya and MAB moved up which is why hes not the #1 guy at those weights. So stop this 1 of 4 BS. It doesnt help your argument at all.
dude, just stop
Leonard's 'win' over Marvin trumps anyone on PAC's resume
then you start throwing names like Hearns, Duran and Benitez and the gap widens even more
the dumb**** TS was just looking for people as ****** as he is and you're providing that for himComment
-
-
He fought Pancho Villa at a catch-weight. So what are you talking about?He fought in an era where there were hardly any mexican, rican, asian or other latino fighters in the lower weights. Added to that blacks were heavily discriminated against.
Pacquiao is the lineal champ at 4 weights and ranked #1 at welterweight currently. Also rated #2 at 122 and #3 at 135. He got offered a fight with De La Hoya and MAB moved up which is why hes not the #1 guy at those weights. So stop this 1 of 4 BS. It doesnt help your argument at all.
Look at who he beat. He beat guys who were better than the guys Pac beat.
Also during McLarning reign there was no 122 weight-class and just one belt.
So I repeat, what was your original point.Comment
-
lol. a flyweight champ dominating, crushing, beating up career WWs isn't impressive?No it does not
And, beating rank WWs don't really mean much. I mean Zaveck is a rank WW. Is that suppose to be impressive?
I mean if Leonard fought in a garbage cruiserweight division and beat a weak ranked CW. Is not surpass a win over say Benitez or Duran because the CW would have been bigger. You see what I'm saying?
but again, namewise on a resume, srl takes it, but one could really build a strong argument for pac, for his long championship run thru multiple divisions and still DOMINATING top fighters in the HIGHEST weight class he's been.Comment
-
Pacquiao was the flyweight champion and now hes the welterweight champion winning belts in between. In total a record 8.
If SRL went up to heavyweight and beat Mike Tyson, youd have a case.Comment
-
Of course Leonard fought garbage guys that was not my point lol. Sigh. He also fought guys who are much much better than the guys Pac have fought. But, again that was not my point.
I would say Marg was garbage and that was above WW, this Shane fight garbage.
lol @ pretending.Comment
, that's you gave...Nothing...You're so ******ed it's quite ridiculous.
Comment