Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who has the better resume Sugar Ray Leonard or Manny Pacquiao?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I don't see how Pac can be rated over Ray Leonard. Even if he beat Mayweather, I think it's still clearly Leonard.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
      No it does not

      And, beating rank WWs don't really mean much. I mean Zaveck is a rank WW. Is that suppose to be impressive?

      I mean if Leonard fought in a garbage cruiserweight division and beat a weak ranked CW. Is not surpass a win over say Benitez or Duran because the CW would have been bigger. You see what I'm saying?
      does pac have a garbage fight at ww mofo?....stop pretending to be a pacfan mofo...

      you act as if srl leanrd never fought for a garbage ass titles..he actaully has two titles thats bs..

      Comment


      • Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
        Do you know who McLarnin is? Maybe you should do some research on him.

        But, it's easier to become a title holder when you have 4 instead of 1 no?

        So I repeat, what is your point?
        He fought in an era where there were hardly any mexican, rican, asian or other latino fighters in the lower weights. Added to that blacks were heavily discriminated against.

        Pacquiao is the lineal champ at 4 weights and ranked #1 at welterweight currently. Also rated #2 at 122 and #3 at 135. He got offered a fight with De La Hoya and MAB moved up which is why hes not the #1 guy at those weights. So stop this 1 of 4 BS. It doesnt help your argument at all.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by pacquia0 View Post
          He fought in an era where there were hardly any mexican, rican, asian or other latino fighters in the lower weights. Added to that blacks were heavily discriminated against.

          Pacquiao is the lineal champ at 4 weights and ranked #1 at welterweight currently. Also rated #2 at 122 and #3 at 135. He got offered a fight with De La Hoya and MAB moved up which is why hes not the #1 guy at those weights. So stop this 1 of 4 BS. It doesnt help your argument at all.


          dude, just stop


          Leonard's 'win' over Marvin trumps anyone on PAC's resume

          then you start throwing names like Hearns, Duran and Benitez and the gap widens even more



          the dumb**** TS was just looking for people as ****** as he is and you're providing that for him

          Comment


          • Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
            See what? , that's you gave...Nothing...You're so ******ed it's quite ridiculous.
            nothing?....ive been on this thread since page 5 mofo,lol.. ....it's youre turn now ******....

            Comment


            • and i HATE that mother****er Leonard

              Comment


              • Originally posted by pacquia0 View Post
                He fought in an era where there were hardly any mexican, rican, asian or other latino fighters in the lower weights. Added to that blacks were heavily discriminated against.

                Pacquiao is the lineal champ at 4 weights and ranked #1 at welterweight currently. Also rated #2 at 122 and #3 at 135. He got offered a fight with De La Hoya and MAB moved up which is why hes not the #1 guy at those weights. So stop this 1 of 4 BS. It doesnt help your argument at all.
                He fought Pancho Villa at a catch-weight. So what are you talking about?

                Look at who he beat. He beat guys who were better than the guys Pac beat.

                Also during McLarning reign there was no 122 weight-class and just one belt.

                So I repeat, what was your original point.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
                  No it does not

                  And, beating rank WWs don't really mean much. I mean Zaveck is a rank WW. Is that suppose to be impressive?

                  I mean if Leonard fought in a garbage cruiserweight division and beat a weak ranked CW. Is not surpass a win over say Benitez or Duran because the CW would have been bigger. You see what I'm saying?
                  lol. a flyweight champ dominating, crushing, beating up career WWs isn't impressive?

                  but again, namewise on a resume, srl takes it, but one could really build a strong argument for pac, for his long championship run thru multiple divisions and still DOMINATING top fighters in the HIGHEST weight class he's been.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI- View Post
                    dude, just stop


                    Leonard's 'win' over Marvin trumps anyone on PAC's resume

                    then you start throwing names like Hearns, Duran and Benitez and the gap widens even more



                    the dumb**** TS was just looking for people as ****** as he is and you're providing that for him
                    Pacquiao was the flyweight champion and now hes the welterweight champion winning belts in between. In total a record 8.

                    If SRL went up to heavyweight and beat Mike Tyson, youd have a case.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by puga View Post
                      does pac have a garbage fight at ww mofo?....stop pretending to be a pacfan mofo...

                      you act as if srl leanrd never fought for a garbage ass titles..he actaully has two titles thats bs..
                      Of course Leonard fought garbage guys that was not my point lol. Sigh. He also fought guys who are much much better than the guys Pac have fought. But, again that was not my point.

                      I would say Marg was garbage and that was above WW, this Shane fight garbage.

                      lol @ pretending.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP