I don't see how Pac can be rated over Ray Leonard. Even if he beat Mayweather, I think it's still clearly Leonard.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who has the better resume Sugar Ray Leonard or Manny Pacquiao?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostNo it does not
And, beating rank WWs don't really mean much. I mean Zaveck is a rank WW. Is that suppose to be impressive?
I mean if Leonard fought in a garbage cruiserweight division and beat a weak ranked CW. Is not surpass a win over say Benitez or Duran because the CW would have been bigger. You see what I'm saying?
you act as if srl leanrd never fought for a garbage ass titles..he actaully has two titles thats bs..
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostDo you know who McLarnin is? Maybe you should do some research on him.
But, it's easier to become a title holder when you have 4 instead of 1 no?
So I repeat, what is your point?
Pacquiao is the lineal champ at 4 weights and ranked #1 at welterweight currently. Also rated #2 at 122 and #3 at 135. He got offered a fight with De La Hoya and MAB moved up which is why hes not the #1 guy at those weights. So stop this 1 of 4 BS. It doesnt help your argument at all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pacquia0 View PostHe fought in an era where there were hardly any mexican, rican, asian or other latino fighters in the lower weights. Added to that blacks were heavily discriminated against.
Pacquiao is the lineal champ at 4 weights and ranked #1 at welterweight currently. Also rated #2 at 122 and #3 at 135. He got offered a fight with De La Hoya and MAB moved up which is why hes not the #1 guy at those weights. So stop this 1 of 4 BS. It doesnt help your argument at all.
dude, just stop
Leonard's 'win' over Marvin trumps anyone on PAC's resume
then you start throwing names like Hearns, Duran and Benitez and the gap widens even more
the dumb**** TS was just looking for people as ****** as he is and you're providing that for him
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by pacquia0 View PostHe fought in an era where there were hardly any mexican, rican, asian or other latino fighters in the lower weights. Added to that blacks were heavily discriminated against.
Pacquiao is the lineal champ at 4 weights and ranked #1 at welterweight currently. Also rated #2 at 122 and #3 at 135. He got offered a fight with De La Hoya and MAB moved up which is why hes not the #1 guy at those weights. So stop this 1 of 4 BS. It doesnt help your argument at all.
Look at who he beat. He beat guys who were better than the guys Pac beat.
Also during McLarning reign there was no 122 weight-class and just one belt.
So I repeat, what was your original point.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostNo it does not
And, beating rank WWs don't really mean much. I mean Zaveck is a rank WW. Is that suppose to be impressive?
I mean if Leonard fought in a garbage cruiserweight division and beat a weak ranked CW. Is not surpass a win over say Benitez or Duran because the CW would have been bigger. You see what I'm saying?
but again, namewise on a resume, srl takes it, but one could really build a strong argument for pac, for his long championship run thru multiple divisions and still DOMINATING top fighters in the HIGHEST weight class he's been.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI- View Postdude, just stop
Leonard's 'win' over Marvin trumps anyone on PAC's resume
then you start throwing names like Hearns, Duran and Benitez and the gap widens even more
the dumb**** TS was just looking for people as ****** as he is and you're providing that for him
If SRL went up to heavyweight and beat Mike Tyson, youd have a case.
Comment
-
Originally posted by puga View Postdoes pac have a garbage fight at ww mofo?....stop pretending to be a pacfan mofo...
you act as if srl leanrd never fought for a garbage ass titles..he actaully has two titles thats bs..
I would say Marg was garbage and that was above WW, this Shane fight garbage.
lol @ pretending.
Comment
Comment