Is Pacquiao the undisputed WW champ?

[Heeb]

No, its not even arguable.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

That's unified and not undisputed..

No, you can be unified if you hold 2 belts. Undisputed is all 4. Lineal is the man who beat the man.

Pac and Floyd are none of these things.

[mikemurni]

No, you can be unified if you hold 2 belts. Undisputed is all 4. Lineal is the man who beat the man.

Pac and Floyd are none of these things.

ok that make sense

[al22tec]

Among the alphabets, its WBA, WBC, and throw in the ring that matters. Obviously, there is no unified holder. And what with all these arguments for or against, it is obvious that there is an ongoing DISPUTE, so there is obviously NO undisputed champion. The question is: is he undisputed. He is not. He can be, if he cleans up the division, but at present, he is not.

[loui_ludwig]

Nope his not.

[pbftxrs316]

floyd is in hindsight--mosley was, but he lost to floyd, but floyd didn't pay sanctioning fees so the title wasn't up for grabs--but floyd is the ww champion because of lineage---

[pbftxrs316]

didn't berto win the wbc that was vacated by floyd? and cotto did the same thing--he fought for a vacant title didn't he?

[kadyo's]

didn't berto win the wbc that was vacated by floyd? and cotto did the same thing--he fought for a vacant title didn't he?

Why don't you make you're own thread about your beloved floyd being the undisputed WW champ?

[IronDanHamza]

But they werent. Cotto was no1, Williams was no2 and Margarito was no3 when Cotto fought Margarito.

Williams was signed to fight at 154 when Cotto-Margarito happened.

I believe thats why the majority saw Cotto-Margarito for the Lineage as the winner of the fight would be #1 and the loser of the fight would be #2. So in theory it was the #1 Vs. #2 because after the fight was done, Williams wouldn't be ranked at 147. If Williams date was swaped with the Cotto-Margarito fight (2 months within each other) It would have been the #1 Vs. #2.