Thats the main point Terry.
Any chance you could elaborate on that ?
What I am specifically referring to is..... Arum's second "negotiation" for the Mayweather fight. The negotiation that had no meetings, no talks, no agreements, no contracts, no deals, NOTHING..... including no offer of negotiation.
Arum just submitted an offer that by all reports was worse than the first negotiation, and then immediately slapped a two week deadline on it, which sounds absurd in hindsight.
So regarding the Marquez situation, I wonder what Bob's counter-offer was, if he in fact made one at all that is?
Any chance that you could elaborate for the posters that don't seem to be understand how an actual negotiation works?
In your experience.....
Is the outright rejection of an offer, or the outright refusal to discuss terms, a conventional approach when negotiating a major fight like Mayweather or Marquez?
Any chance you could elaborate on that ?
What I am specifically referring to is..... Arum's second "negotiation" for the Mayweather fight. The negotiation that had no meetings, no talks, no agreements, no contracts, no deals, NOTHING..... including no offer of negotiation.
Arum just submitted an offer that by all reports was worse than the first negotiation, and then immediately slapped a two week deadline on it, which sounds absurd in hindsight.
So regarding the Marquez situation, I wonder what Bob's counter-offer was, if he in fact made one at all that is?
Any chance that you could elaborate for the posters that don't seem to be understand how an actual negotiation works?
In your experience.....
Is the outright rejection of an offer, or the outright refusal to discuss terms, a conventional approach when negotiating a major fight like Mayweather or Marquez?
Comment