Trinidad or Cotto, who was the best all around fighter? And More liked in PR?

[RIZO24]

I have no sense?

@ss whipe I am PR and the general census in PR hold Tito in much higher regard than Cotto you really want to debate this?

Read through the post's before you talk pendejo! quite a bit of people think Cotto is the better all around fighter!!GTFOH Lame ASSS Puta!!

[jrosales13]

I love Cotto but in truth Miguel doesn’t have anything on Tito.

Charisma: Tito >>>>> Cotto

Chin: (though you can debate this for centuries) Tito >>>>>>>> Cotto

Power: (shall I even go there?) Tito >>>>>Cotto

Skill: Tito>>>>>>>>Cotto

Punching accuracy: Tito>>>>>Cotto

Stamina: Tito>>>>>>>>>Cotto

Quality of opponents: Tito>>>>>>>>Cotto

Overall accomplishments in the sport: Tito>>>>>>>>Cotto


Like JRO said “It’s not even debatable.”

I like Cotto but Tito would still be underfeated at welterweight right now.

Both of you guys stop sounding Arrogant. I would say it in Guatemalteco but I don't even know what language that is.

[jrosales13]

Read through the post's before you talk pendejo! quite a bit of people think Cotto is the better all around fighter!!GTFOH Lame ASSS Puta!!

Yea, you respect peoples opinions alright.

[RIZO24]

Both of you guys stop sounding Arrogant. I would say it in Guatemalteco but I don't even know what language that is.

Wow I cant believe you dont speak your native tongue? lol
Were'nt you going to also write a boxing encyclopedia in Guatemalteco??

[jri9d0]

Read through the post's before you talk pendejo! quite a bit of people think Cotto is the better all around fighter!!GTFOH Lame ASSS Puta!!

Tell you what **** head, next time you want to ask a question regarding a “debatable” response add a poll. Comprende? Or shall I right it in crayon for you?

And the people who suggested Cotto being the overall better fighter probably just tuned in because unlike Miguel :


1. Tito never lost to a Mexican.


2. Miguel never unified three divisions

3. Tito had more title defenses at welter than Cotto

4. Tito sold more PPV buys than Cotto.

Shall I go on?

It’s a good thing ******ity isn’t a crime otherwise they would have given you the death penalty at birth, maybe your mother should have traded you in for a parakeet at least then you’d be relevant.

But hey, thanks for responding anyway because your idiocy is noted!

[jrosales13]

Wow I cant believe you dont speak your native tongue? lol
Were'nt you going to also write a boxing encyclopedia in Guatemalteco??

Umm...I didn't know Guatemalteco was a native tongue. Never heard that language before. If I do write one it would be in Spanish but my spelling in Spanish is not so good. More than likely in English.

[ny123]

Trinidad is better and would win a head to head match up if both were in their primes and fought.

[fightfan2007]

Trinidad is better and would win a head to head match up if both were in their primes and fought.

id buy that... altho id give cotto a slight chance of maybe sneaking a decision

[joseph5620]

I am not even sure if Cotto is the better boxer,

And, Cotto got hit a lot more so than Tito did IMO.

And, I don't even think Cotto chin was as Tito chin either.

I agree with you. I don't see how anybody can even make a case that Cotto is better.

[jri9d0]

id buy that... altho id give cotto a slight chance of maybe sneaking a decision

No offense dude (and I’m not trying to flame) but how?

Cotto’s Achilles heel is pressure fighters with a big punch and let’s not even get into Miguel’s stamina issues. Tito get’s stronger in the later rounds while Cotto backpedals.

And do you really think Cotto could eat left hooks from Tito for the duration of twelve rounds?