Im a Mexican and IMO Tito Trinidad was a better puncher but Cotto was a better boxer. Trinidad was a little shaky on his feet it seemed to me. Cotto seems to be a lot more rounded and sturdy fighter. Now I dont know who was bigger or more liked in Pr, What do you think?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Trinidad or Cotto, who was the best all around fighter? And More liked in PR?
Collapse
-
From what I was told from a friend of mine who travels back and froth from PR to Miami to NY, the PR people rock for Cotto cause he's still the current guy right now, but Tito is still more beloved mainly because of his personality.
Skill wise, I think both were cut from a different cloth. I think Trinidad is the more dangerous puncher as where Cotto is probably the more well rounded of the two as far as fundamentals go.
-
Cotto is a better boxer, Trinidad's a better puncher.
Trinidad was bigger in PR than Cotto due to the fact that Cotto is not as charismatic as Tito. Even Juanma is getting HUGE in PR cuz he is a little more charismatic than most.
All being said Cotto is the superstar right now in PR so people will respond no matter what!!
Comment
-
TITO, TITO, TITO!
Tito was the better welterweight.
If they were both in their primes at 147, I'd take Tito by early KO in a somewhat exciting fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by el20cuatro View PostIm a Mexican and IMO Tito Trinidad was a better puncher but Cotto was a better boxer. Trinidad was a little shaky on his feet it seemed to me. Cotto seems to be a lot more rounded and sturdy fighter. Now I dont know who was bigger or more liked in Pr, What do you think?
Comment
-
-
Comment