Answer Honestly - Do You Want To See Pac take OSDT?

[apokalips]

Yeah why not? It shuts people up about steroid this, steroid that and means that the fight with Mayweather would happen...I just wanna see the fight and see no downside to better testing whatsoever. I don't care about any of the *****ing over why he shouldn't have to be tested...boxing needs better testing that is a fact and if this helps boxing as a sport progress why not do it?

It may be a hassle or annoyance but who cares if the result of it is one of the biggest fights in history and possibly the advancement of standardised testing in the sport?

Yet again, I honestly don't see any logical argument AGAINST better testing, no one says the testing is perfect but it is a damn sight better than the existing protocol

[piano man]

take the test mister congressman

[mrcupide2]

IF he has nothing to hide he shoudl take the tests, if he takes the tests and beats mayweather than he will prove to every1 taht he is clean and its all hard work and skills

[DondiNeverLeft]

Kindly answer this honestly, as fans of BOXING.

Whether or not it's in the context of a fight with Floyd Jr.,
do you want to see boxer Manny Pacquiao undergo so-called
"Olympic-style Drug Testing" (OSDT), and why?

"Olympic-style", because it's not really 365/12/4/24/7 random:
it would be just during the 60 days leading up to the fight, and
then immediately after.

Naturally, his opponent would undergo the same regimen, as
administered by the local WADA assign or analogue (in the U.S.,
this would be USADA).

------
Note 1:
(If Pacquiao's own personal attitude matters at all...)
Keep in mind that the only pronouncements on the issue that
we 100% surely know came out of Pacquiao's mouth (on video
AND unfiltered by Koncz's or Arum's coaching or editing; AND
unaffected by later insults and mudslinging from other parties)
had him reluctantly willing --but willing nonetheless-- to give
blood up to 2 days before the fight (per ABS-CBN news video
interview, December 29, 2009, at the Wapakman premiere, at
SM North Edsa). Also keep in mind however, that Pacquiao has
misgivings about losing ANY blood so close to a fight.

Note 2:
(If fiscal risk considerations matter at all...)
Keep in mind as well, that any invasive testing is going to be
highly unlikely in the 14 days prior to the fight, although the
testing agency may never admit to it for the sake of plausibly
maintaining a premise of fully 'random' testing.

Hell yeah take the test.
I doubt he fails anyway. Not that he wasn't on something in the past but he will not be on something during the OST tests.
The real test is WILL HE WIN WHEN HE TESTS NEGATIVE?

[Earl-Hickey]

He should because he will pass anyway and it'll shut mayweather up which is always nice.

[strongisland24]

its so shady that manny wont do it. why do people see past that? he's ****n shady man.

[Vasyl’s dad]

Only if its mandated by a boxing comission and not a boxer and "all" boxers including journeyman have to take it too.

Thats how I'm rolling with it.

[markfrombrookly]

He should. If he's clean it shouldn't be a problem. Mosley took steroids in the past and didn't have a problem with taking RANDOM drug testing. If Pac doesn't do roids he should take the testing then beat Mayweather and he can make Mayweather look ****** if that's the case.

[Vasyl’s dad]

My curiosity is piqued. I wanna know whether he's juicing or not.

You should be more curious about the guy in your avatar.

[Vasyl’s dad]

its so shady that manny wont do it. why do people see past that? he's ****n shady man.

So, Floyds 40 fights without this extra testing are shady too, right?

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=447917