There's a difference between making a list and the list actually having any truth to it. It's hard to discredit Jones when all he fought was top 10 guys in every division.
I take it that you didnt see the list. It's quite an impressive array of top fighters not being on Jones resumé. Toney is there, but little else at 168.
I take it that you didnt see the list. It's quite an impressive array of top fighters not being on Jones resumé. Toney is there, but little else at 168.
We've seen the list but what does it matter if those other guys weren't interested? And that list isn't as impressive as Jones' resume.
It's pretty funny that he lost his 0 to Julio Cesar Gonzalez. While Roy Jones took Gonzalez's 0 prime vs prime 1-2 years earlier.
DM's career was all but over there. Look it's highly probable that Jones would have won against DM, but all we are left with is what-ifs since the fight didnt happen.
I take it that you didnt see the list. It's quite an impressive array of top fighters not being on Jones resumé. Toney is there, but little else at 168.
i remember that list, hilarious how it's all jones fault all those fights didn't happen, because in boxing there were only ever 3 ducks, roy, floyd and david haye
The class of fighters Jones did not fight at 168 >>>>>> those he fought.
Yes, at 168. But he did beat the best fighter there. The only other great in the division. Furthermore, the TS is implying these fighters were "ducked", which is silly.
I take it that you didnt see the list. It's quite an impressive array of top fighters not being on Jones resumé. Toney is there, but little else at 168.
This is Kev, i've been here since 2006, i've seen your list and even posted in that thread I believe
i remember that list, hilarious how it's all jones fault all those fights didn't happen, because in boxing there were only ever 3 ducks, roy, floyd and david haye
Tweet
Comment