Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I like Cotto, but Margarito makes him quit again!!!!!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
    Those are Indians smart guy! You are about as Indian as Ricky Martin!
    hahaha goes to show how ****i ng ****** you are... you did not decipher it dumb ass... you never been to puerto rico and you have no idea what the f uck you talking about.. but feel free to correct me if i am wrong.

    read the history and then come back and see what you say.. was the island empty when columbus arrived? lets start there.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
      Those are Indians smart guy! You are about as Indian as Ricky Martin!
      also that is the seal of the institute of puerto rican culture, the spaniard and the african are not indians... you are blind for sure you know if you hit cntl + you can zoom in to the screen.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Cuauhtémoc1502 View Post
        I agree he was competitive but let's be real here, even if he was given a round by a judge, it was all Pac.

        I mean it was better than Cotto vs Pac but only because Marg is an animal who doesn't stop.

        While it was "competitive" he was still dominated because he lost every if not the vast majority of the rounds.
        You agree he was competetive. RIGHT.

        Rounds are subjective, that wasn't my argument (someone else's).


        Tony was dominated on the scorecards. But he was competetive for two thirds of the fight and that was my point all along. The cards don't tell the whole story of the fight. Margarito was competetive for the majority of it.


        It was better than Cotto-Pac because Margarito had more to offer the fight. Period.


        BTW, I didn't claim it was FOTY. I've seen fans suggesting it as being up there, though, and fan opinion should count for something.








        Originally posted by BMWM3P View Post
        Not according to this

        http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=438317

        I didn't hear them I was a piss at the time, I read them here.
        Well, you read wrong. Look it up.

        Originally posted by BMWM3P View Post
        By who, some other ****** on his personal blog.

        Where have you seen that?

        Because I certainly haven't.
        I don't read blogs. Most would agree this was an excellent fight, even if it lacked a great show-closer.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
          Xenophobic? Puerto Ricans are American citizens not immigrants! See how I argued my point? Weather you agree or not is of no consequence the fact is i gave a point to back up my claim instead of just making up stories or giving an irrelevent and vague statement.
          you statement is xenophoic in nature. or what would you call it? a fact?/ LOL

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Aracibo04 View Post
            The question again is:
            why should I waste my time with some one who is completely convinced of his stand?

            second question:
            Would you change your mind about that statement? ---> "Foraskin island and the ****** people who live there"

            with regards to your ****** argument that i who came here when i was 12 am not an inmigrant. this is where your gringo ass gets lost. just because we are citizens doesnot not mean we have the same culture as you do. so when we come here for the first time it is in fact a foreing place. thus making us outsiders until we assimilate. but you would not understand that because you are not puerto rican or an inmigrant.

            Xenophobe: The first is a population group present within a society that is not considered part of that society. Often they are recent immigrants, but xenophobia may be directed against a group which has been present for centuries, or became part of this society through conquest and territorial expansion. This form of xenophobia can elicit or facilitate hostile and violent reactions, such as mass expulsion of immigrants, pogroms or in other cases, genocide.

            The second form of xenophobia is primarily cultural, and the objects of the phobia are cultural elements which are considered alien. All cultures are subject to external influences, but cultural xenophobia is often narrowly directed, for instance, at foreign loan words in a national language. It rarely leads to aggression against individual persons, but can result in political campaigns for cultural or linguistic purification. In addition, entire xenophobic societies tend not to be open to interactions from anything "outside" themselves, resulting in an isolationism that can further xenophobia.
            Gringo first of all refers to American/Yankee which you are too so if you are gonna be racist use gabacho. But unfortunatly for you I am not white Im from the same Indian/Spaniard basterdization and I too have been a victim of Xenophobia as you so put it. I don't dislike you because of your race and i essentially have the same culture as you do so Im certinally not Xenophobic as I too came here as a child. I just dislike you because you and your people are ***ing ****** the end.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Aracibo04 View Post
              you statement is xenophoic in nature. or what would you call it? a fact?/ LOL
              Im an immigrent you are a guy who came from some quasi state with you citizenship already in hand. Calm down! It's like saying a man from Cali moves to new york and when people make fun of him because hes from California you are gonna paint him a victim of xenophobia? Get real!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
                Gringo first of all refers to American/Yankee which you are too so if you are gonna be racist use gabacho. But unfortunatly for you I am not white Im from the same Indian/Spaniard basterdization and I too have been a victim of Xenophobia as you so put it. I don't dislike you because of your race and i essentially have the same culture as you do so Im certinally not Xenophobic as I too came here as a child. I just dislike you because you and your people are ***ing ****** the end.
                sory but im not a gringo and second this really applies to you because you keep saying the same thing and proving my point that it is a waste of time to try to convince someone who is firmly standing in whatever dumb belief he deems to be the truth. in your case that puerto ricans are ***ing ****** to the end.

                I have given you reasonable arguments since the moment you claimed i did not have any yet you insist.

                so what is my culuture? are you caribbean? coz if you are then yea I conceed that you have the same culture as I but if you are not then i completely disagree.
                Last edited by Aracibo04; 11-16-2010, 05:33 PM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by MAN IN WHITE View Post
                  You agree he was competetive. RIGHT.

                  Rounds are subjective, that wasn't my argument (someone else's).


                  Tony was dominated on the scorecards. But he was competetive for two thirds of the fight and that was my point all along. The cards don't tell the whole story of the fight. Margarito was competetive for the majority of it.


                  It was better than Cotto-Pac because Margarito had more to offer the fight. Period.


                  BTW, I didn't claim it was FOTY. I've seen fans suggesting it as being up there, though, and fan opinion should count for something.









                  Well, you read wrong. Look it up.


                  I don't read blogs. Most would agree this was an excellent fight, even if it lacked a great show-closer.

                  Wow, just when you thought you heard it all. Now Pac vs Cheato was a competitive, fight of the year candidate, that could have gone either way. Have fun trying to convince someone of that.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
                    Im an immigrent you are a guy who came from some quasi state with you citizenship already in hand. Calm down! It's like saying a man from Cali moves to new york and when people make fun of him because hes from California you are gonna paint him a victim of xenophobia? Get real!
                    your example does not hold water because it is one thing to have a different english accent and move to a different state, it completely another to go from a completely different culture (maybe not as much now days) and not speak a lick of english.

                    just coz you want to limit the definition of inmigrant to those who come here from a different country whether via visa or just crossing the border does not mean that your definition of inmigrant is correct in the case of puerto ricans.

                    whats your race or ethnic group? coz you say you are a mix also. ?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Aracibo04 View Post
                      sory but im not a gringo and second this really applies to you because you keep saying the same thing and proving my point that it is a waste of time to try to convince someone who is firmly standing in what every dumb belief he deems to be the truth. in your case that puerto ricans are ***ing ****** to the end.

                      I have given you reasonable arguments since the moment you claimed i did not have any yet you insist.

                      so what is my culuture? are you caribbean? coz if you are then yea I conceed that you have the same culture as I but if you are not then i completely disagree.
                      Don't waste your time on this ******. He is a trolling Mall cop who is thought of as the village idiot on these forums and it's not liked by anyone.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP