Please someone with commonsense tell me how you discredit floyds hatton win

[FerdinandMarcos]

Well, duh

Martinez, P-Will, Angulo, Dzinziruk...

I mean who is saying other wise?

It shouldn't be somebody claiming there were better fighters available than Hatton.

You can't justify the Tony fight and down-grade the Hatton win at the same time.


A LOT more people gave Hatton a better shot at winning than Margarito.

[jrosales13]

It shouldn't be somebody claiming there were better fighters available than Hatton.

You can't justify the Tony fight and down-grade the Hatton win at the same time.


A LOT more people gave Hatton a better shot at winning than Margarito.

Why not when they were?

Does Marg do anything for Pac legacy? No, should Pac or Marg be called champ if they win? no, have either done anything at JMW to have the right to be fighting for a vacant JMW title? No, should Pac be called an 8 division title holder if he wins? No.

Were they better opponents, tougher, and more deserving then Marg? Yes, where they better, tougher opponents for Floyd at WW than Ricky Hatton? You bet your ass there is.

So what exactly is your point? It seems like you're trying to make a point to me. But, at the same time you not doing anything but bringing up a BS fight, for a BS vacant title. So I wish you could make your point already.

[megadeth]

At the end of the day, there are other JMWs at the time that are tougher and better than what Antonio Margarito..

They just are.

I can do this to most of Manny's career.

Wow, you took the words right out my mouth!

[jrosales13]

Wow, you took the words right out my mouth!

So since he couldn't make his point, maybe you can for him? So respond to me.

[FerdinandMarcos]

Why not when they were?

Does Marg do anything for Pac legacy? No, should Pac or Marg be called champ if they win? no, have either done anything at JMW to have the right to be fighting for a vacant JMW title? No, should Pac be called an 8 division title holder if he wins? No.

Were they better opponents, tougher, and more deserving then Marg? Yes, where they better, tougher opponents for Floyd at WW than Ricky Hatton? You bet your ass there is.

So what exactly is your point? It seems like you're trying to make a point to me. But, at the same time you not doing anything but bringing up a BS fight, for a BS vacant title. So I wish you could make your point already.

Hatton had a title and was the 2nd biggest draw in the sport.

Does Margarito have a title...is he the 2nd biggest draw in boxing?

EVERYBODY wanted Hatton/Maweather

NOBODY wanted Pacman/Margarito

[Dirk Diggler UK]

He was the welterweight champ with a stacked division and he chose to fight a junior welter who looked bad in his only fight at 147. The bout itself was also ruined by terrible refereeing.

I understand why the fight was made and I supported it as a Hatton fan but Floyd doesnt deserve that much credit for it considering there were at least 3/4 more dangerous fights

[FerdinandMarcos]

Wow, you took the words right out my mouth!

.........

[FerdinandMarcos]

He was the welterweight champ with a stacked division and he chose to fight a junior welter who looked bad in his only fight at 147. The bout itself was also ruined by terrible refereeing.

I understand why the fight was made and I supported it as a Hatton fan but Floyd doesnt deserve that much credit for it considering there were at least 3/4 more dangerous fights

154 is stacked and Nanny chose to fight a guy that didin't even have a license...much less a title.

Yet you don't complain.

I wonder why??????????????????

Hatton should not have refused Floyd at 140...i'm just saying.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

154 is stacked and Nanny chose to fight a guy that didin't even have a license.

Yet you don't complain.

Hatton should not have refused Floyd at 140...i'm just saying.

I thought this thread was about Floyd Mayweather vs Ricky Hatton?

[jrosales13]

Hatton had a title and was the 2nd biggest draw in the sport.

Does Margarito have a title...is he the 2nd biggest draw in boxing?

EVERYBODY wanted Hatton/Maweather

NOBODY wanted Pacman/Margarito

Being a draw doesn't make you a great fighter.

And, I don't know if Hatton was the 2nd biggest draw either. There is no proof of that at all.

Anyways anything that you're saying right now doesn't take away from the fact that there are better JMW's and JWW than Marg. Nor does it take away that there were better WWs at WW than Hatton.

You keep bring up Pac and Marg. But, I really don't understand why? I don't get what you trying to do? You act like if Marg would do ANYTHING for Pac legacy. Which is ridiculous, it is a BS fight, for BS vacant title, at a BS catch-weight.

So again what is your point here? Can you make it quick?