Please someone with commonsense tell me how you discredit floyds hatton win

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • infamous larryx
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 10881
    • 512
    • 265
    • 1,565

    #1

    Please someone with commonsense tell me how you discredit floyds hatton win

    saying floyd didnt fight hatton at 140 and 147 was to high for hatton when floyd himself started at 130???
  • toysale
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 726
    • 14
    • 0
    • 6,842

    #2
    Originally posted by prophet larryx
    saying floyd didnt fight hatton at 140 and 147 was to high for hatton when floyd himself started at 130???
    You can't discredit this win from him, he won a belt at 147 (Collazo - which was close but he did win IMO) before fighting Floyd anyway and Hatton was at his all time high of confidence. He didn't look bad in the previous fights leading up to that fight.

    Comment

    • infamous larryx
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 10881
      • 512
      • 265
      • 1,565

      #3
      i mean seriously..why do people discredit every fighters wins??

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #4
        It's a solid win. Nothing great but pretty solid.

        Comment

        • infamous larryx
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2010
          • 10881
          • 512
          • 265
          • 1,565

          #5
          Originally posted by IMDAZED
          It's a solid win. Nothing great but pretty solid.
          i 100 percent agree..nice solid win

          Comment

          • MindBat
            floyd gobbler
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2006
            • 16853
            • 571
            • 841
            • 25,210

            #6
            It was a spectacular win. And many fans here and abroad expected Ricky to batter Floyd from pillar to post. Problem is, the way Floyd beat Ricky. Most were in absolute shock at the way Ricky lost. Besides, if Floyd would have refused to fight him, we would have an umpteen amount of threads about Floyd ducking Ricky when Ricky called him out.

            Comment

            • lfc19titles
              Undisputed Champion
              • Mar 2010
              • 8731
              • 725
              • 628
              • 94,838

              #7
              Originally posted by prophet larryx
              i mean seriously..why do people discredit every fighters wins??
              You will find every Pac fan will discredit every Floyd win

              every Floyd fan will discredit every Pac win

              its something people need to just accept, its why I avoid almost every discussion involving pac and floyd because some fan boy will come and call me ***** or ******* when I question their so called logic

              Now floyds win for me was good, pacs win for me as very good, 140 and 147 is a big difference and hatton would obviously be better against a 140 fighter

              Comment

              • Mojita
                U.S. Marine
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 2489
                • 87
                • 26
                • 9,549

                #8
                Idk why you Floyd fans cry "he was at 130 blah blah" Those were his younger days. His body grew into a higher weight class each year. So stop giving that BS excuse around. I was 130 when i was younger. but if i fight and lose at 147 i can use the excuse well back then i was 130 but my body grew into 147 so i had no choice but to fight here now so this defeat shouldnt matter? If he shouldnt be at 147 then im pretty sure he wouldnt have been there.
                Hatton never belonged at 147. Mayweather was already used to 147 and thats that. The win isnt huge. it was just to sell tickets and make money.

                Comment

                • IMDAZED
                  Fair but Firm
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 42644
                  • 1,134
                  • 1,770
                  • 67,152

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Mojita
                  Idk why you Floyd fans cry "he was at 130 blah blah" Those were his younger days. His body grew into a higher weight class each year. So stop giving that BS excuse around. I was 130 when i was younger. but if i fight and lose at 147 i can use the excuse well back then i was 130 but my body grew into 147 so i had no choice but to fight here now so this defeat shouldnt matter? If he shouldnt be at 147 then im pretty sure he wouldnt have been there.
                  Hatton never belonged at 147. Mayweather was already used to 147 and thats that. The win isnt huge. it was just to sell tickets and make money.
                  Agree on the whole weight thing. Mayweather was clearly bigger and stronger than Hatton. He may have been a 130lber years ago but he isn't anymore. *******s use this same kind of bullsh&t.

                  Comment

                  • Tiozzo
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2007
                    • 6234
                    • 278
                    • 330
                    • 6,886

                    #10
                    Originally posted by prophet larryx
                    saying floyd didnt fight hatton at 140 and 147 was to high for hatton when floyd himself started at 130???
                    how ? by saying Hatton is a ******* addict and that he can't see his own penis between fights

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP