Please someone with commonsense tell me how you discredit floyds hatton win

[jrosales13]

1.Hatton had a title.

2.There was LOTS OF CLAMOR for Hatton/Mayweather

3.Hatton was a HUGE draw.

4.You know damn well Ya'll would say Floyd ducked Hatton.

I wasn't happy when that fight got signed. I just wasn't I can show you threads were I said Hatton didn't have a chance but whatever...

All I know is that they were better and tugher WWs than Hatton was at that time.

They just were. It is, what it is.

But, is still a solid win, but nothing great IMO.

At that time a win over P-Will, Marg, Cotto, and Shane(even his win against Shane now was better IMO than the Hatton win) would have been much better for Floyd.

Just my opinion.

Anyways this is what you should of said in the first place instead of going a whole different route.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

1.Hatton had a title.

2.There was LOTS OF CLAMOR for Hatton/Mayweather

3.Hatton was a HUGE draw.

4.You know damn well Ya'll would say Floyd ducked Hatton.

Finally you say something on topic. I actually agree with the points 2 and 3 wholeheartedly. I dont blame Floyd all that much for taking the fight. But Hatton at 147 was still Hatton at 147, you can only get so much credit for the win.

On point 1, no he didnt, not at 147. On point 4, who's "ya'll" and I wouldnt have if he fought someone better.

[The Surgeon]

saying floyd didnt fight hatton at 140 and 147 was to high for hatton when floyd himself started at 130???

Well i think its a good win and, after gettin got up in the hype and the moment plus the fact Ricky had alot going for him going in, Picked Hatton to win! But i guess the reasoning is some fighters just dont move up the weights aswell, Ricky being one of em and Floyd not. For example i thought JMM beat Pac twice but think at 147 Manny would lay him out cold

[jpunieves]

saying floyd didnt fight hatton at 140 and 147 was to high for hatton when floyd himself started at 130???

if someone discredits how pac destroyed ricky in 2 rounds, and points out that floyd has knocked him out earlier but in more rounds... floyd's win over ricky is sloppy indeed

[FerdinandMarcos]

Finally you say something on topic. I actually agree with the points 2 and 3 wholeheartedly. I dont blame Floyd all that much for taking the fight. But Hatton at 147 was still Hatton at 147, you can only get so much credit for the win.

On point 1, no he didnt, not at 147. On point 4, who's "ya'll" and I wouldnt have if he fought someone better.

Hatton had a chance to fight Floyd at 140...but he refused.

Didn't you know that??

It happened at 147 because of Hatton....not Floyd.

[Toney616]

Hatton was a class C+ fighter. It was a good win, NOT a great win

[FerdinandMarcos]

if someone discredits how pac destroyed ricky in 2 rounds, and points out that floyd has knocked him out earlier but in more rounds... floyd's win over ricky is sloppy indeed

Floyd beat Hatton BEFORE Manny did.

He beat Hatton FIRST.

Mayweather took his ZERO.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Hatton had a chance to fight Floyd at 140...but he refused.

Didn't you know that??

It happened at 147 because of Hatton....not Floyd.

So whats your point? Does Mayweather deserve more credit because it "could have" been at 140? I dont understand...

[FerdinandMarcos]

Hatton was a class C+ fighter. It was a good win, NOT a great win

He must have been an F- when he fought Manny.

[FerdinandMarcos]

So whats your point? Does Mayweather deserve more credit because it "could have" been at 140? I dont understand...

Damn you're slow.

People...you one of them..are quick to point out 140 was Hatton's best weight and that he's not a true WW.

That's the point Adolf.