Please someone with commonsense tell me how you discredit floyds hatton win

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • King Ju-Ju
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 6479
    • 147
    • 38
    • 6,758

    #31
    Hatton sucks at 147. I mean sucks period compared 2 some1 like Floyd but at 147 he was a bum. Collazo was rockin' Ricky.

    Comment

    • FerdinandMarcos
      Banned
      • Oct 2010
      • 2110
      • 72
      • 0
      • 2,223

      #32
      Originally posted by BoxeoBoriqua
      Hatton sucks at 147. I mean sucks period compared 2 some1 like Floyd but at 147 he was a bum. Collazo was rockin' Ricky.
      So what?

      Juan Lazcano was rocking Ricky at 140.

      Comment

      • AFighter4U
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 3576
        • 63
        • 0
        • 9,768

        #33
        Originally posted by prophet larryx
        saying floyd didnt fight hatton at 140 and 147 was to high for hatton when floyd himself started at 130???
        I won't discredit floyd's win over hatton. Of course, it takes great skill for someone to do to hatton what Floyd did.

        Both Pac and Floyd masterfully beat Hatton. They just did it differently and in their own way.


        I simply find Pac's fight vs Hatton more entertaining, that's all.

        Comment

        • Bastian Loc
          schweinsteiger innit?
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Sep 2010
          • 10027
          • 334
          • 180
          • 17,886

          #34
          Floyd was at 130 in 2001 Larry, don't be a damn fool man. When he was like 20 years old.

          Hatton's best weight is clearly 140 as evidenced by his loss to Collazo at 47' where he looked like crap.

          I don't discredit it per se, but its not really a great win because:

          1)Hatton is a natural 40' pounder

          2)Hatton was never that good to begin with

          Comment

          • DARKSEID
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2010
            • 17578
            • 962
            • 512
            • 43,940

            #35
            Floyd's win over Hatton was one of his best- he fought an incredible HOF english bulldog in his prime.

            You can't discredit it.

            but it does nothing for his argument as being the top welterweight when he beat a JR WW

            and it honestly wasn't the best fight floyd could have taken when he could have fought other ranked welterweights.

            Comment

            • Chups
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2004
              • 18402
              • 1,835
              • 1,281
              • 52,879

              #36
              Originally posted by FerdinandMarcos
              So what?

              Juan Lazcano was rocking Ricky at 140.
              ???

              Collazo-Hatton was close, bare got away with a win. Hatton dominated Lazcano.

              Comment

              • FerdinandMarcos
                Banned
                • Oct 2010
                • 2110
                • 72
                • 0
                • 2,223

                #37
                Originally posted by Chups
                ???

                Collazo-Hatton was close, bare got away with a win. Hatton dominated Lazcano.
                Watch the fight.

                Lozcano had Ricky out on his feet...at 140.

                Hatton should have fought Floyd at 140 when he there trying to fight him.

                Comment

                • Bastian Loc
                  schweinsteiger innit?
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 10027
                  • 334
                  • 180
                  • 17,886

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Chups
                  ???

                  Collazo-Hatton was close, bare got away with a win. Hatton dominated Lazcano.
                  lmao, gtfo.

                  He didn't dominate ****. Lazcano was kicking his ass all over the ring. Hatton got rocked so badly at one point the ref made up some excuse to stop the fight mid round to give him time to recover.

                  Chumps.

                  Comment

                  • FerdinandMarcos
                    Banned
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 2110
                    • 72
                    • 0
                    • 2,223

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Rbgnwo
                    Floyd's win over Hatton was one of his best- he fought an incredible HOF english bulldog in his prime.

                    You can't discredit it.

                    but it does nothing for his argument as being the top welterweight when he beat a JR WW

                    and it honestly wasn't the best fight floyd could have taken when he could have fought other ranked welterweights.
                    *******s are slow...so i'll repeat this.

                    Hatton declined Mayweather at 140..


                    Is Antonio Margarito the best opponent available for Nanny??

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Chups
                      ???

                      Collazo-Hatton was close, bare got away with a win. Hatton dominated Lazcano.
                      Come on, you know you never watched Hatton-Lazcano. You've never watched any fight outside of a Manny one. And it clearly shows from this post.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP