Hatton sucks at 147. I mean sucks period compared 2 some1 like Floyd but at 147 he was a bum. Collazo was rockin' Ricky.
Please someone with commonsense tell me how you discredit floyds hatton win
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Both Pac and Floyd masterfully beat Hatton. They just did it differently and in their own way.
I simply find Pac's fight vs Hatton more entertaining, that's all.Comment
-
Floyd was at 130 in 2001 Larry, don't be a damn fool man. When he was like 20 years old.
Hatton's best weight is clearly 140 as evidenced by his loss to Collazo at 47' where he looked like crap.
I don't discredit it per se, but its not really a great win because:
1)Hatton is a natural 40' pounder
2)Hatton was never that good to begin withComment
-
Floyd's win over Hatton was one of his best- he fought an incredible HOF english bulldog in his prime.
You can't discredit it.
but it does nothing for his argument as being the top welterweight when he beat a JR WW
and it honestly wasn't the best fight floyd could have taken when he could have fought other ranked welterweights.Comment
-
Comment
-
He didn't dominate ****. Lazcano was kicking his ass all over the ring. Hatton got rocked so badly at one point the ref made up some excuse to stop the fight mid round to give him time to recover.
Chumps.Comment
-
Floyd's win over Hatton was one of his best- he fought an incredible HOF english bulldog in his prime.
You can't discredit it.
but it does nothing for his argument as being the top welterweight when he beat a JR WW
and it honestly wasn't the best fight floyd could have taken when he could have fought other ranked welterweights.
Hatton declined Mayweather at 140..
Is Antonio Margarito the best opponent available for Nanny??Comment
-
Comment
Comment