Dan Rafael: "A seven-day cutoff is quite REASONABLE but Floyd still REFUSED to budge"

[IMDAZED]

at this clown, maybe next time you should READ.

I did. Your point? Oh right...the usual...

So instead they want to dissect USADA protocol, they want to talk about Floyd's personal issues, they want to attack other posters. Sorry girls...it doesn't change 1, 2, and 3. But keep trying.

[Red_Menace]

Pac denying the first round of obscure testing left many to believe he was juicing.. No denying that, but that was in Jan. Speed up to today, Pac has complied to testing which today we have no fight and the only words outta Floyd and his camp are..

1. Im not thinking about boxing
2. Im going to take a year or two off
3. And since you agree that the 2nd round of negotiations took place. Floyd has denied that they have...

Lets live in the NOW, not back in Jan.

But his camp just said that during the second negotiation he wanted a 7 day cutoff for blood testing. So even in the second negotiation I think he's ducking the full testing procedure.

[V.WEBB]

I just don't understand why some of you guys are so gung-ho about following the NSAC drug testing when NSAC had no problems with USADA coming in as long as they met the NSAC requirements.

As far as I can tell, the only argument in support of that is, "Why should Manny bend to Mayweather's will?!" Are you guys really concerned about protecting Manny's fragile ego? I think you should be less naive about the possibility that the real reason he doesn't want to be tested is he doesn't want to fail the test and destroy his career.

Um...I think we now why.

[maguirre]

"A seven-day cutoff is quite REASONABLE but Floyd still REFUSED to budge"

Because he's a coward.

IT'S EMBARRASSING.

[Red_Menace]

"A seven-day cutoff is quite REASONABLE but Floyd still REFUSED to budge"

Because he's a coward.

IT'S EMBARRASSING.

Good point. You must have put a lot of thought into that. I'm pretty sure you will change everyone's mind. The caps and bold is a nice touch. That really hammered the point home. It wouldn't have been convincing in regular lower-case.

[maguirre]

Good point. You must have put a lot of thought into that. I'm pretty sure you will change everyone's mind. The caps and bold is a nice touch. That really hammered the point home. It wouldn't have been convincing in regular lower-case.

Nah. Like I said these debates are for entertainment purpose only. The whole world is saying the same exact thing.

Floyd Mayweather Jr is a coward.

[Bee Keepz]

I did. Your point? Oh right...the usual...

So instead they want to dissect USADA protocol, they want to talk about Floyd's personal issues, they want to attack other posters. Sorry girls...it doesn't change 1, 2, and 3. But keep trying.

...and other countries knock the American school system.

[Red_Menace]

Nah. Like I said these debates are for entertainment purpose only. The whole world is saying the same exact thing.

Floyd Mayweather Jr is a coward.

He could be a coward. And Manny could be a doping cheat. The two are not mutually exclusive. Somehow people think Mayweather possibly being a coward is evidence that Pac is not doping.

Like I said, this is actually not a Mayweather vs Pacquiao issue. This is a Pacquiao vs Drug Testing issue. Drug testing is winning.

[trainhard_187]

Nah. Like I said these debates are for entertainment purpose only. The whole world is saying the same exact thing.

Floyd Mayweather Jr is a coward.

I personally never said Floyd was a coward, but when you have writers, networks, boxing websites saying it then I would have to believe that Floyd just isnt interested in Pacquiao..

[maguirre]

If I were Pac I'd have said to Floyd, "**** your OST ****. **** your easy fight, easy money crap."

And... I'd rather want him to beg for the fight. Beggars can't be choosers.

And that may well happen in the third round. Assuming the second round never took place.