Why is 7 Days Not Good Enough??

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BuckToothed
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 2715
    • 300
    • 139
    • 22,872

    #191
    Originally posted by jrosales13
    Dazed has always prech "no cut-off" even back then in January he didn't like Floyd giving Pac a 14 day cut off he was against it.

    The question was if 14 day cut of was fair to Pac. And, Dazed since he thinks it should no cut off said it was MORE than fair. If I remember correctly.

    Dazed has always been consistent in this. Which is what I respect.

    My problem with posters like Burner who said in June that 14 days was fair that Floyd should accept. To now making long posts on how 14 days ain't good enough anymore. My question to him is what change from June to now? That is inconsistency that I don't like.
    I didn't like that you answered for him, but what you said is true, then it's acceptable.
    But again, this isn't about right or wrong, it's fair or unfair.
    If he thinks it's fair back in January, then he should have no problem thinking it's even more fair now that it's 7 days.

    That is all I was asking.

    The day that Floyd budged and offered 14 days is the day that OST became a business proposition rather than a scientific one.
    With that said, Team Pac treated it as such by making business compromises (i.e. 30,24,14,7) until an agreement is reached.

    Comment

    • BuckToothed
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 2715
      • 300
      • 139
      • 22,872

      #192
      Originally posted by IMDAZED
      Nothing changed. The question was whether 14 days was fair, not right. How ****** can you people be?
      Originally posted by BuckToothed
      I didn't like that you answered for him, but what you said is true, then it's acceptable.
      But again, this isn't about right or wrong, it's fair or unfair.
      If he thinks it's fair back in January, then he should have no problem thinking it's even more fair now that it's 7 days.

      That is all I was asking.

      The day that Floyd budged and offered 14 days is the day that OST became a business proposition rather than a scientific one.
      With that said, Team Pac treated it as such by making business compromises (i.e. 30,24,14,7) until an agreement is reached.
      If you could have said that since the first post, rather than downplaying it and calling names, we would have saved 10kb of disk space.

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #193
        Originally posted by BuckToothed
        If you could have said that since the first post, rather than downplaying it and calling names, we would have saved 10kb of disk space.
        Wow, you really are that ******

        Comment

        • Chuckguy
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 13927
          • 345
          • 183
          • 58,389

          #194
          Originally posted by NesNY
          What does it matter?

          Accepting OST means nothing. Something else will ALWAYS come up. Floyd Mayweather wants nothing to do with Manny. Manny doesn't feel he needs Floyd either, thus he'll never accept OST.

          If Arum is right about the $25m or so Manny's about to make...then everyone can agree.....Pac simply doesn't need Floyd or anyone who'll dictate terms to him. Floyd doesn't either.

          move on and support boxers like JMM who fight whoever, whenever. Support Khan/Maidana...support Paul Williams/Martinez....JuanMa/Rafa....the Klitschkos...etc...

          fighters who, even if it takes a little back and forth negotiation, are willing to fight. For christ's sake...even Bradley and Alexander agreed to terms.

          I'm waiting for Manny and Floyd to give us their last performances, then we can move on to the next superstars....Ortiz, Bradley, Canelo, JuanMa, etc...
          ***en awesome post!
          Green K!

          Comment

          • Doctor_Tenma
            Monster
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 33313
            • 1,327
            • 1,249
            • 58,127

            #195
            Originally posted by BuckToothed
            I didn't like that you answered for him, but what you said is true, then it's acceptable.
            But again, this isn't about right or wrong, it's fair or unfair.
            If he thinks it's fair back in January, then he should have no problem thinking it's even more fair now that it's 7 days.

            That is all I was asking.

            The day that Floyd budged and offered 14 days is the day that OST became a business proposition rather than a scientific one.
            With that said, Team Pac treated it as such by making business compromises (i.e. 30,24,14,7) until an agreement is reached.
            Hate to get involved in this but we must also remember that Pacquiao originally wanted a 30 day cutoff, so both camps headed to mediation and Mayweather wanted to meet him somewhere in the middle, 14 days. So in that sense it was fair, reason I voted fair. Pacquiao's camps wasn't having any of it and decided they wanted a 24 day cutoff.

            Comment

            • davidoff
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jun 2009
              • 857
              • 55
              • 27
              • 7,054

              #196
              Nice to see the expert chemists and drug clinicians on the forum have chimed in again with how seven days is insufficient. No coming back from their facts.

              Comment

              • Biolink
                Donaire is #1
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2006
                • 9927
                • 642
                • 2,209
                • 40,170

                #197
                Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
                Hate to get involved in this but we must also remember that Pacquiao originally wanted a 30 day cutoff, so both camps headed to mediation and Mayweather wanted to meet him somewhere in the middle, 14 days. So in that sense it was fair, reason I voted fair. Pacquiao's camps wasn't having any of it and decided they wanted a 24 day cutoff.
                Thank you for beating me to this.

                We have to keep it perspective to what was going on at the time

                Comment

                • BuckToothed
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 2715
                  • 300
                  • 139
                  • 22,872

                  #198
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  Wow, you really are that ******
                  At least I'm not the one flip-flopping with what I think is fair, and admit nothing changed!

                  You said this isn't about right or wrong, which I agreed.

                  What made it FAIR back in January and unfair with 7 days now, without anything changing?

                  GOT ******?

                  Comment

                  • BuckToothed
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 2715
                    • 300
                    • 139
                    • 22,872

                    #199
                    Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
                    Hate to get involved in this but we must also remember that Pacquiao originally wanted a 30 day cutoff, so both camps headed to mediation and Mayweather wanted to meet him somewhere in the middle, 14 days. So in that sense it was fair, reason I voted fair. Pacquiao's camps wasn't having any of it and decided they wanted a 24 day cutoff.
                    Which is fine, I have no issues with that line of thought.
                    So now that it's 7 days, do you think it's still fair?

                    It seems to me that people thought that it was fair, since it was Floyd that proposed it.
                    Now that Manny is proposing half of what Floyd proposed, then it's not fair all of the sudden.

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #200
                      Originally posted by BuckToothed
                      At least I'm not the one flip-flopping with what I think is fair, and admit nothing changed!

                      You said this isn't about right or wrong, which I agreed.

                      What made it FAIR back in January and unfair with 7 days now, without anything changing?

                      GOT ******?
                      When did I say seven days was unfair? See how pathetic your argument is becoming? The bottom line is that it doesn't matter whether YOU think I contradicted myself (which, as others noted, I definitely didn't). The bottom line is your hero Manny and his non-stop contradictions. When are you gonna ask him why HE keeps changing his mind and mixing them in with so many lies? Hmm, sweetheart?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP