Why is 7 Days Not Good Enough??
Collapse
-
Comment
-
OK so your saying nevermind that fact that team pac has to keep lying about drug testing, right??? because thats what the thread is about, not vacations. You bringing that up shows me you have nothing to offer this thread. Your guy said he agreed to full testing, no? Then it comes out that it was a lie and he didnt agree to no cut offs but he agreed to 7 days. Now if May already said no cut offs or no fights, then when team drug i mean team pac came to the table with 7 day cut off then yeah he went on vacation because Pac didnt want to fight with no ost cut off...drug teting is irrelevant due to the fact that floyd is on "vacation" at home making ustream videos whilst pacquiao is actually boxing. i find it funny that pac ripped on him saying his style isnt difficult, yet floyd stayed silent. when hatton made a comment rippin into floyd after castillo fight he wanted it straight away! this drug testing is just another excuse along with the thousands of other excuses floyd uses to avoid fighting.Comment
-
No full testing no fight...Manny passed on that money not agreeing to the test dumb ass, think before you speak. What ever money or fame you say Floyd left on the table so did Manny...damn you guys let being a fan of someone turn you into dumb assesLast edited by odogg8121; 10-25-2010, 10:31 AM.Comment
-
So which ass was your head in when you said that 14 days was fair back in January?I'm bringing up their LIES. LOL @ inconsistencies.
30 days until we found out he had his blood tested within 30 days against Hatton. Then he changed his mind.
24 days until we found out he was blood tested within 19 days of the Clottey bout. Then he changed his mind.
Now seven. Maybe you should stop worrying about other posters and start concentrating on that nasty stench in the air. Or maybe you think that smell is normal because you're head remains in Pacquiao's ass.
You still haven't answered the question, you keep bringing up issues I didn't ask.
I'm a grown man, I know lies when I hear them. You on the other hand said 14 days was fair and then started preaching "no cut-off". What changed?Comment
-
My question is...
Is the test random all the way up to the cut off date? Whichever date it is(14 or 7). And, a test after the fight.
Or is there set dates until the cut off?
Also will urine be tested all the way up to the fight?
Either way Floyd fans would make excuses if Pac wins with a cutoff so I just hope Pac finally decides to take the test all the way up to the fight. From WW below I think Pac has the best chance to beat Floyd. And, I don't want to hear any excuses coming from Floyd fans.Comment
-
Comment
-
This is what Tygart (head of USADA) said in '09:
"Were you just using the Nevada, or the state of California, system? If that's the case, I'm not worried about the 14-day or the 24-day blackout period, I'm worried about the rest of it. If someone's telling you that's where it fell apart, I think you've got to add the follow-up, 'Well, what kind of testing was going to happen before the 14-day or the 24-day blackout period?' The 14-day period, I'm a lot less concerned about that than what you're doing in the two months before that 14-day period."
It means he was not concern about the cutoff but more of the type of testing thats goin' to take place before that. Imo, I think he meant about the randomness of the blood testing... This is when Pac was giving specific dates on when the blood testing is done which he obviously disagrees.
Now here is what he said after the Mosley-Mayweather fight
“That totally misses the point,” Tygart said of the reaction some may have upon hearing of Pacquiao’s concession and the timing of Mayweather’s last blood test. “If you know you aren’t going to be tested within the last 14 days, you can cheat and get away with it. It is our right to test at any time, 30 days before the fight, 20 days before, the week of, the morning of – that provides the deterrent. If you block out a period of time and say we can’t test during that period, then an athlete could cheat and get away with it.”
Which meant that he was advocating now the full randomness of the fight up to the day fight itself...Which is a total reversal of what he said in '09
So you see there is no saint in these issue.. Everybody is lying or expressing half truths that would benefit each camp. So dont come here like its big deal that Team Pac lied, because Team Mayweather themselves have their hands dirty on this issue.. Believing one side of the story is just simply nuthuggingLast edited by mikemurni; 10-25-2010, 10:23 AM.Comment
-
Dazed has always prech "no cut-off" even back then in January he didn't like Floyd giving Pac a 14 day cut off he was against it.So which ass was your head in when you said that 14 days was fair back in January?
You still haven't answered the question, you keep bringing up issues I didn't ask.
I'm a grown man, I know lies when I hear them. You on the other hand said 14 days was fair and then started preaching "no cut-off". What changed?
The question was if 14 day cut of was fair to Pac. And, Dazed since he thinks it should no cut off said it was MORE than fair. If I remember correctly.
Dazed has always been consistent in this. Which is what I respect.
My problem with posters like Burner who said in June that 14 days was fair that Floyd should accept. To now making long posts on how 14 days ain't good enough anymore. My question to him is what change from June to now? That is inconsistency that I don't like.Comment
-
epo leaves yous system in 3 to 4 daysNow i ask you again bro, since you're the drug expert around here, what can you possibly hide in 7 days?!! What??!!! Or is it just Floyd being an arrogant little coward and hiding behind that 0 days, he's like the bully from my little brother's school who keeps on beating up my brother half his size, but when i finally confronted him he said to me that he only fights kids from their school.. Are you like that??!!!Comment

Comment