Bruce Blitz Video: He feels Calzaghe LOST against Hopkins

[daggum]

Are you ******ed? He held a boxers head down and the boxer threw a light punch and it hit part of his cup because he held the boxers head down. Hey ******, stop trying to make things out to be the way they're not. You're not funny, you're probably fat and out of shape.

You are like the dumbest poster on this website, because you're ****ing blind and you like to suck nards balls. You probably were in jail with him, you two probably were butt-buddies.

i'm not making them out to be the way they aren't. i know the rules of boxing. it doesn't matter how the low blow happened but if a low blow happens in any way you are given time to recover. yea it didn't look like a severe low blow but it also wasn't the first time calzaghe went low so cortez rightfully gave hopkins time to recover.

what does this have to do with calzaghe winning the fight? how did calzaghe win 6 rounds in this fight? because calzaghe low blowed hopkins he wins the fight? i'm checking the official rules of judging a boxing match and i don't see low blows being a scoring criteria. i guess you just use your own biased way of scoring fights?

[starkiller]

I scored it 116-111 for Calzaghe.

Hopkins was humiliated by Calzaghe.

[IMG]http://a669.ac-images.*******cdn.com/images01/90/l_a051cc4d7542d9162525125bc7041f4c.gif[/IMG]

HAHAHA, that is why BHOP got bum ****d for being a lil ***** for holding Calz's head down and getting nipped on the cup because Calz couldn't see since BHOP held his head-down.

Then BHOP acting like he had asthma and tried to make a low-blow(that was caused by BHOP holding Calz's head down, WORSE than it really was to buy time since he was gassing against Calz).

[Steelhammer2011]

I scored it 116-111 for Calzaghe.

Hopkins was humiliated by Calzaghe.

[IMG]http://a669.ac-images.*******cdn.com/images01/90/l_a051cc4d7542d9162525125bc7041f4c.gif[/IMG]

[BennyST]

114-113 Hopkins..........

Calzaghe did not win that fight.

You, a Hopkins fan, had the fight for Hopkins by one point and you say "Calzaghe did not win that fight".

Could it be that if you had it that close it means that many others gave Calzaghe one or two more rounds that were very close and could have gone either way?

[daggum]

I scored it 116-111 for Calzaghe.

Hopkins was humiliated by Calzaghe.

[IMG]http://a669.ac-images.*******cdn.com/images01/90/l_a051cc4d7542d9162525125bc7041f4c.gif[/IMG]

yet you scored kotelnik-alexander for kotelnik as i did. very puzzling. let's see why. kotelnik and hopkins were the one's landing the clean punches while calzaghe and alexander kept throwing ineffective punches that didn't land. now why would you have kotelnik winning but not hopkins? oh right he's not a white european. carry on.

[starkiller]

yet you scored kotelnik-alexander for kotelnik as i did. very puzzling. let's see why. kotelnik and hopkins were the one's landing the clean punches while calzaghe and alexander kept throwing ineffective punches that didn't land. now why would you have kotelnik winning but not hopkins? oh right he's not a white european. carry on.

Hopkins punched air except in the first round. This was an ugly fight because both fighters punched air, you're a moron to compare this to kotelnik-alexander. Kotelnik was clearly landing his punches and BHOP wasn't with the exception of the 1rst round and that headbutt later in the fight!

[Dirk Diggler UK]

You, a Hopkins fan, had the fight for Hopkins by one point and you say "Calzaghe did not win that fight".

Could it be that if you had it that close it means that many others gave Calzaghe one or two more rounds that were very close and could have gone either way?

Yeah its funny when people score the fight by one point (i.e the flash KD) yet say there was no way Calzaghe won the fight.

[daggum]

You, a Hopkins fan, had the fight for Hopkins by one point and you say "Calzaghe did not win that fight".

Could it be that if you had it that close it means that many others gave Calzaghe one or two more rounds that were very close and could have gone either way?

no because hopkins clearly won at least 6 rounds. the rounds hopkins won calzaghe barely laid a glove on him. he was being generous to calzaghe with that scorecard.

[daggum]

Hopkins punched air except in the first round. This was an ugly fight because both fighters punched air, you're a moron to compare this to kotelnik-alexander. Kotelnik was clearly landing his punches and BHOP wasn't with the exception of the 1rst round and that headbutt later in the fight!

lol watch the videos you can clearly see he's not punching air. he's landing crisp counters in between calzaghe's wide slaps that you think are landing. your bias is severely clouding your judgment. you either refuse to watch the videos or refuse to see what is happening.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

yet you scored kotelnik-alexander for kotelnik as i did. very puzzling. let's see why. kotelnik and hopkins were the one's landing the clean punches while calzaghe and alexander kept throwing ineffective punches that didn't land. now why would you have kotelnik winning but not hopkins? oh right he's not a white european. carry on.

Poor comparison. Kotelnik not only landed cleaner punches but he landed more punches than Alexander. Hopkins landed the cleaner punches but about 2/3 per round on average. Calzaghe outworked him with pitty pat punches