Surely Pacquiao is top 10/20 greatest fighters of all time

[Stone Roses!]

^^^^^***** Tard, that list is all wrong.

Pacquiao should be No.1

[Stone Roses!]

Ledwaba and Clottey



Its the truth.

Alot of peoples top 20 inlcudes a load of white fighters who clearly dont deserve to be there. Pacquiao definately deserves to be there.

You are a fool.

[NChristo]

Honestly when it's all said and done, Pacquiao will be a top 20 ATG for sure. The only people who say otherwise are those who hold old fighters on a higher pedestal than they should be.

FWIW I don't think he will ever break top 7, but again he will finish in the top 20 for sure. There are too many "never been done before" accomplishments on his resume for him not to be.

I said it's not fair too rank him so high now, wait until his career is over otherwise you are comparing him with people like SRR and Langford which just isn't fair on him and is expecting him to do much more impressive things then he already has done.

When his career is over people should start ranking him but not now, it's just simply not fair on him imo, but whatever he does now he's a solid top 50 ATG and I don't really see why some people on here take that as a bad thing, it's incredible to even be in the top 100.

But imo, he will end up a top 25 or so ATG most probably, we'll just have to wait and see.

Pacquiao is a top 10 ATG.

Most people dont include him because there busy nuthugging white fighters who fought in an era full of bums. Pacquiao fought in an era of latinos and blacks he deserves all his props.

Without a doubt the best reason I've ever heard for Pac being a top 10 ATG. I can see why some people rank him there now.

[Tyson.]

You are a fool.

Your kind know nothing about boxing, stick to MMA.

[Stone Roses!]

Your kind know nothing about boxing, stick to MMA.

My Kind??

Ok, let me ask of you this.

List these so called "white bums" who people place regularly in their Top 20 ATG lists and we will compare resumes.

C'mon then, I'm waiting.

[jrosales13]

Its the truth.

Alot of peoples top 20 inlcudes a load of white fighters who clearly dont deserve to be there. Pacquiao definately deserves to be there.

No it is not the truth you're an idiot.

A white fighter in Willie Pep would schol the shit and make Morale look silly. Don't get it twisted. There are no Latinos IMO as great as Greb or Pep. But. that is just my opinion.

[The Big Dunn]

What were the reasons given as to why fighterx or fighter y is an ATG? Is it just wins, ko's, titles, styles, etc. Was there a common set of variables used to make the decision?

[Flomo Tard]

^^^^^***** Tard, that list is all wrong.

Pacquiao should be No.1

Absolutely not.

He could be as low as Top 6, to be honest. If he wins an alphabet middle weight title in addition to ANY jr. middleweight title, I'll solidify him at no. 3. If he wins a lineal middleweight title then he equals Robbie at number one or at the minimum solidifies himself at no. 2.

Number 2 to number 6 of my list are interchangeable, in my opinion. Only number one is solid pending future achievement by the only active member of my all time p4p list.

A win or loss against Margarito and Mayweather wouldn't make a difference in my ranking of Pacquiao. And Clottey didn't make a difference either.

[Khalid X]

I said it's not fair too rank him so high now, wait until his career is over otherwise you are comparing him with people like SRR and Langford which just isn't fair on him and is expecting him to do much more impressive things then he already has done.

When his career is over people should start ranking him but not now, it's just simply not fair on him imo, but whatever he does now he's a solid top 50 ATG and I don't really see why some people on here take that as a bad thing, it's incredible to even be in the top 100.

Honestly me and you think the same. I don't have Pacquiao ranked at all right now.

The only reason I can say B-hop, Jones, Barrera and Morales are in my top 50 is due to the fact that there careers are pretty much finished.

Sure they may fight some journey men here and there but outside of Hopkins, I can't see any of the aforementioned fighters doing anything to add to their legacy.

Again I agree with you 100%, which is why I said when it's all said and done. Only then can we reflect on his career and get a true gauge as to where he should be ranked.

I still believe, and when I said that I was speaking in general, that those who don't have him in the top 20 will more than likely be those who hold older fighters in higher regards than they should be.

You know the type that forget those same legendary fighters where guilty of the same things current fighters get accuses of such as ducking, cherry picking etc.

BTW that diss to burner wasn't aimed at you. I only said that because he is the type of poster that will do this; If you stated that Manny was top 25, then you don't know **** about boxing (according to him), but if you say he is not even top 50, then you are a top 3 poster on NSB.

It's funny how your knowledge of the sport changes when you say something that he wants to hear.

[Tyson.]

No it is not the truth you're an idiot.

A white fighter in Willie Pep would schol the shit and make Morale look silly. Don't get it twisted. There are no Latinos IMO as great as Greb or Pep. But. that is just my opinion.

Pep or Grebs opposition was weak compared to Pacquiao.

They fought bums and that is why their skills looked so good.

Benitez, Whitaker, RJJ, Mayweather, Hopkins, Toney, SRL, Hearns etc are all more skilled than those lot.

Stop nuthugging fighters that you have never seen fight and realise why those kind of fighters arent doing so well today.