Did Sergio Martienz, Kotelnik, Collazo really get bad decisions?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ChampBox@PR
    Team Cotto
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2010
    • 7531
    • 274
    • 172
    • 14,602

    #41
    Originally posted by King Koopa
    The Martinez/Williams fight was a close bout that could've went either way. However Martinez was robbed by the Pierre Benoist 119-110 score.

    The Collazo/Berto fight was a close bout that could've went either way. However Collazo was robbed by the Bill Clancy 116-111 score.

    The Kotelnik/Alexander was a close bout, but Kotelnik won, and was robbed by a clean 116-112 sweep by the judges.

    The first two bouts could've went either way therefore the loser wasn't "robbed" technically, but one judge from each bout ruined it by sleeping through the contest making it seem like a total sham. The third was clear bias towards the undefeated hometown HBO fighter. A rematch should be in order for all three.

    Unfortunately, we might only get one at the best.

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP