Who really won the first Mayweather v Castillo fight?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cupocity303
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2005
    • 9604
    • 752
    • 750
    • 22,038

    #111
    Originally posted by Siren 666
    Poll says what the fans thought.
    Doesn't really matter does it. 53 vs 83 means that the fight wasn't that clear and obvious that the whole world thought Castillo won.

    Let me teach you a new definition called "Argumentum ad Populum":




    In logic, an argumentum ad populum (Latin: "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or all people believe it; it alleges: "If many believe so, it is so."

    This type of argument is known by several names,[1] including appeal to the masses, appeal to belief, appeal to the majority, appeal to the people, argument by consensus, authority of the many, and bandwagon fallacy, and in Latin by the names argumentum ad populum ("appeal to the people"), argumentum ad numerum ("appeal to the number"), and consensus gentium ("agreement of the clans"). It is also the basis of a number of social phenomena, including communal reinforcement and the bandwagon effect



    This is what you're doing.
    Last edited by cupocity303; 08-02-2010, 11:55 PM.

    Comment

    • Mr Punch.
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2010
      • 1072
      • 103
      • 119
      • 1,273

      #112
      Originally posted by cupocity303
      Doesn't really matter does it. 53 vs 83 means that the fight wasn't that clear and obvious that the whole world thought Castillo won.

      Let me teach you a new definition called "Argumentum ad Populum"




      In logic, an argumentum ad populum (Latin: "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or all people believe it; it alleges: "If many believe so, it is so."

      This type of argument is known by several names,[1] including appeal to the masses, appeal to belief, appeal to the majority, appeal to the people, argument by consensus, authority of the many, and bandwagon fallacy, and in Latin by the names argumentum ad populum ("appeal to the people"), argumentum ad numerum ("appeal to the number"), and consensus gentium ("agreement of the clans"). It is also the basis of a number of social phenomena, including communal reinforcement and the bandwagon effect



      This is what you're doing.
      Would you believe me if i can prove Mayweather has losses?

      Comment

      • DiLLiNGER
        Banned
        • Jan 2009
        • 6093
        • 324
        • 423
        • 7,749

        #113
        Pacquiao is a ***** scared of a random blood test..mayweather beat castillo period..maybe we should talk about pacquiao getting hurt by body jabs hahaahhahahahhahahhaa remember???

        Comment

        • Mr Punch.
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2010
          • 1072
          • 103
          • 119
          • 1,273

          #114
          Originally posted by DiLLiNGER
          Pacquiao is a ***** scared of a random blood test..mayweather beat castillo period..maybe we should talk about pacquiao getting hurt by body jabs hahaahhahahahhahahhaa remember???
          What has that got to do with Castillo getting robbed? You are the load your Mother should have swallowed.

          Comment

          • slickfox
            Interim Champion
            • Oct 2009
            • 739
            • 52
            • 4
            • 7,948

            #115
            bottomline is that mayweather is undefeated.....some of you want him to lose so badly you gotta go digging

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP