Freddie Roach: "Pacquiao has to SKIP MEALS to make 140 lbs"
Collapse
-
When you train, you burn calories.
If you burn calories more calories than you consume, you lose weight.
Pacquiao doesn't have to cut weight anymore since he fights at 147, so he can eat up to 7,000 calories to maintain his weight.
That's not really that big a number. When you consider how much these guys train, professional athletes consume probably 6,000-10,000 calories on average.Comment
-
Comment
-
Mayweather couldn't even make 44'.
Pac could still make 35'.
Mayweather moved up in weight a long time ago.
Pac only moved up in weight in 2008 (35)
Pac is at least 2 divisions naturally smaller than Fraud.
Live with it.Comment
-
my point is...if you've GROWN INTO THE WEIGHT...you dont have to be FORCE FEDWhen you train, you burn calories.
If you burn calories more calories than you consume, you lose weight.
Pacquiao doesn't have to cut weight anymore since he fights at 147, so he can eat up to 7,000 calories to maintain his weight.
That's not really that big a number. When you consider how much these guys train, professional athletes consume probably 6,000-10,000 calories on average.Comment
-
You don't get stripped of the ring belt.heres to all the dumbass *******s trying to claim manny is some small guy.
you heard it from the horses mouth. pacroid is a WW
they need to strip him of his 140title if hes not going to fight at 140. but that would be right up his alley, again
draining himself to fight at the smaller weight class and be the bigger guy. this guy is a shamComment
-
Comment
-
skip meals as in...his regular intake (I'm guessing) is at least 8000 kcals.
this'll keep him at 145-147 for a WW weigh-in.....he'll rehydrate to 150-152 I'd guess.
for the margo fight (150 weigh-in), he wouldn't have to cut weight OR dehydrate himself. he'll be healthy as a fuggin ox. this is his limit...seeing as how he doesn't have to a cut a single calorie for the weight.
to make 140, yes he'd have to "skip meals" from his WW nutrition regimen (8000+ kcals a day). it's logical.Last edited by NesNY; 08-02-2010, 11:24 AM.Comment

Comment