no fight should have even been negotiated at all

[ADP02]

One of those Doctors reason was because they were scared fighters might get infected by a re-used needle!!! Where in the world would anyone with brains re-use a needle? Especially an organisation like the USADA.

For me those doctors have shot themselves in the foot with that reason and made their whole argument look a bit su****ions..

Here is what I found. Probably more was said but this summary does not mention reusing needles. Maybe what you said was was just to state the obvious or it was part of their list of possibilities but obvious:


Voy also said that while tiny amounts of blood are drawn for testing "it can be dangerous."

That was a theme Dr. Watson chimed in on, saying, "I believe that urine is the best substance to test. I agree with Dr. Voy that urine (random testing) is what we should require and that blood is not necessary.


"I agree with Dr. Voy that there are theoretical and real risks to blood testing one of which is a (boxer getting) a hematoma on the elbow or a clot from missing a vein. There are also HIV and Hepatitis C risks."

Dr. Watson said blood testing should be curtailed "within three to four weeks before (a fight) so that the hemotoma risk does not put a fighter at a disadvantage."


Nevada offered up two doctors and USADA offered its legal beagle-PR chief.

Now that's a mismatch.

[ADP02]

yeah, that's exactly why we call you an idiot. Quite frankly, you're not worth a serious response from me. Good luck, EJ. Handle him if you want.

As for the sentence you highlighted previously, the word incriminating does not necessarily need to be used in the legal sense. Floyd is the reason why this fight didn't happen this time. Floyd admitted he didn't want to fight Manny this year but that is not enough for you. Talk about a thick skull. The truth can be written on your forehead and you still would say you "idiot" but in this instance you would be looking in the mirror (looking at your forehead)!!!