Nah 'cause the IBO doesn't count and the WBO at Heavyweight is pretty meaningless I think Wlad's the best champ to ever hold it. Usually I'd say the parameters for being undisputed relies on having at least 3 of the (WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO) (Preferably the WBA, WBC and IBF). Of course as illustrated above by JK1700, you could get a scenario where someone like Berto could end up with 3 belts without fighting Pacquaio, so it's a rather ambiguous topic.
Personally though I do think Haye was the best in the division at the time, he did get up off the floor to KO Mormeck in Paris and then he beat Enzo, who at the time was considered a legitimate player in the division, know one really considered him a bum until he started losing left, right and centre, after the Haye loss.
Personally though I do think Haye was the best in the division at the time, he did get up off the floor to KO Mormeck in Paris and then he beat Enzo, who at the time was considered a legitimate player in the division, know one really considered him a bum until he started losing left, right and centre, after the Haye loss.



Comment