Hair testing is the way to go for testing PEDs'

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Spoon23
    INVINCIBLE
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 20624
    • 922
    • 904
    • 107,969

    #61
    Originally posted by considerthis
    i wouldn't cheat to begin with. are you too dense to understand that blood testing would serve the purpose of catching cheaters after the fight, as you are proposing hair testing for, as well as catching them before the fight up to a certain date. why use more expensive testing that is less flexible? because one fighter says he's afraid of needles? keep talkin that ***** **** with all the !!!!! like you really showed me.:****you:
    Here is the question again:

    Then answer my question you will still cheat? Answer it explain your answer? Lol this will be good..

    Question: If you are a fighter who takes peds, would you still take Ped's knowing you will get caught with the hair samples you just submitted and the results will come after a few weeks of the fight?

    DIDN'T SAY YOUR A CHEATER. bUT IF YOU WERE ARE YOU GOING TO CHEAT KNOWING YOU WILL GET CAUGHT EVENTUALLY WITH THE HAIR SAMPLES YOU GAVE? PLEASE ANSWER.. 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1.. BOOM!!! OWNED AGAIN. HAHA!
    Last edited by Spoon23; 06-21-2010, 05:52 AM.

    Comment

    • Spoon23
      INVINCIBLE
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 20624
      • 922
      • 904
      • 107,969

      #62
      Originally posted by considerthis
      why do you assume i'm a floyd fan. i'm talkin about a new testing method for the sport...not to make one fight happen. the suggestion of hair testing was made...and i'm sayin why i think blood testing would be a better way to go.
      Here is the question again:

      Then answer my question you will still cheat? Answer it explain your answer? Lol this will be good..

      Question: If you are a fighter who takes peds, would you still take Ped's knowing you will get caught with the hair samples you just submitted and the results will come after a few weeks of the fight?

      DIDN'T SAY YOUR A CHEATER. BUT IF YOU WERE ARE YOU GOING TO CHEAT KNOWING YOU WILL GET CAUGHT EVENTUALLY WITH THE HAIR SAMPLES YOU GAVE? PLEASE ANSWER.. 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1.. BOOM!!! OWNED AGAIN. HAHA!
      Last edited by Spoon23; 06-21-2010, 05:52 AM.

      Comment

      • ThunderWolf
        WildCard
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2009
        • 2598
        • 140
        • 83
        • 10,324

        #63
        Originally posted by Spoon23
        Hair testing is the way to go for testing PEDs'
        Semen is actually blood, you can see it when it dries up. USADA and Floyd can demand this 10x a day and make boxers very happy at the same time.

        Comment

        • Rick Grimes
          The Walking Dead
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 5517
          • 253
          • 18
          • 517

          #64
          Originally posted by ThunderWolf
          Semen is actually blood, you can see it when it dries up. USADA and Floyd can demand this 10x a day and make boxers very happy at the same time.
          WTF? You are a little weirdo.

          Comment

          • Spoon23
            INVINCIBLE
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 20624
            • 922
            • 904
            • 107,969

            #65
            Originally posted by considerthis
            why do you assume i'm a floyd fan. i'm talkin about a new testing method for the sport...not to make one fight happen. the suggestion of hair testing was made...and i'm sayin why i think blood testing would be a better way to go.
            Blood testing is evasive, a better testing is getting the same results and is non evasive to athletes.. Geez your obvioously a *****.. Be proud of who you are lol.. Don't deny it hehe!

            A better testing is a testing procedure that won't affect the athletes. Hence, non-evasive is the way to go lol

            Comment

            • Rick Grimes
              The Walking Dead
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 5517
              • 253
              • 18
              • 517

              #66
              Originally posted by Spoon23
              Blood testing is evasive, a better testing is getting same results and is non evasive.. Geez your obvioously a *****.. Be proud of who you are lol..

              A better testing is a testing procedure that won't affect the athletes. Hence, non-evasive is the way to go lol
              But there's no proof that hair gets the same results as blood is there?

              Comment

              • shogunn
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2007
                • 4553
                • 168
                • 6
                • 11,224

                #67
                Originally posted by considerthis
                why do you assume i'm a floyd fan. i'm talkin about a new testing method for the sport...not to make one fight happen. the suggestion of hair testing was made...and i'm sayin why i think blood testing would be a better way to go.
                throw that argument out of the window because the NSAC stated they WILL NOT take blood too closely to a fight.

                and this is about making one fight happen. Not the fake crusade floyd is on and his dumb fans that seem to be wayyyyy too sold on "blood"

                Comment

                • SplitSecond
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 23151
                  • 1,715
                  • 1,187
                  • 85,044

                  #68
                  what about **** testing?

                  Comment

                  • shade darkar
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 6460
                    • 227
                    • 337
                    • 12,996

                    #69
                    i thought that a while ago, but im not sure you can trace certain peds in hair i thought it was more for recreational drugs. but fcuk knows, im probably wrong.

                    another way you can test is through sweat.

                    Comment

                    • edgarg
                      Honest BoxingScene posts
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2004
                      • 11045
                      • 547
                      • 54
                      • 39,228

                      #70
                      Originally posted by mikemurni
                      Actually, I agree. DNA testing is more accurate using hair samples is less intrusive. And both fighters can be tested until the day of the fight, which is what Floyd wanted to begin with.
                      The hair of Napoleone Buonaparte has been tested some time ago, I think in the last 20 years, to see if arsenic poisoning was the real cause of his death. Considerable arsenic was discovered. The hair samples were nearly 200 years old.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP