Video Analysis - Greatest Fighters Of All Time

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vadrigar.
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 8134
    • 517
    • 415
    • 20,350

    #1

    Video Analysis - Greatest Fighters Of All Time

    Here's a 40 minute segment of experts and analysts telling us who they consider to be the top 20 greatest fighters of all time. Please leave your comments and thoughts about the list.




    Muhammad Ali shares his opinion on p4p rankings:



    thoughts? comments?
    Last edited by Vadrigar.; 06-16-2010, 08:34 AM.
  • Vadrigar.
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 8134
    • 517
    • 415
    • 20,350

    #2
    I guess you posters are still watching it.

    Comment

    • check hook
      Gay Pride
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 9361
      • 379
      • 137
      • 16,005

      #3
      Originally posted by MmuhammadM
      Here's a 40 minute segment of experts and analysts telling us who they consider to be the top 20 greatest fighters of all time. Please leave you comments and thoughts about the list.



      What do you think?


      Gret to watch....good to see Tyson ranked....but the comments from those so called experts = garbage........

      Comment

      • Vadrigar.
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 8134
        • 517
        • 415
        • 20,350

        #4
        Originally posted by check hook
        Gret to watch....good to see Tyson ranked....but the comments from those so called experts = garbage........
        I found some of the arguments bert sugar used quite strange. I am assuming he has watched the cleveland williams fight because in that fight ALi knocked Cleveland williams down going backwards. Bear in mind Ali wasn't a puncher.

        The guy sitting next to bert sugar was just a tool.

        Comment

        • #1Assassin
          Conveyor of Truth
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 8019
          • 647
          • 264
          • 20,993

          #5
          what a joke.. it was more about fame than ability and achievements. i mean seriously tyson at 16, dempsey at 5 and marciano at 4?

          how many HWs were there? they took all the top HWs and squeezed them into the top 20, or almost all the top HWs i should say. how the hell did they overlook ezzard charles just to name one fighter who was left out. considering that they had like 8 or 9 HWs in there.

          again, what a joke.

          Comment

          • r.burgundy
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 1636
            • 177
            • 61
            • 8,290

            #6
            i really hate to hear certain white people talk about mike tyson

            what was even funnier is that they had tunney at 17,and said he beat dempsey twice,but have dempsey at 6

            Comment

            • DannYankee
              Evil Empire
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Oct 2008
              • 7066
              • 338
              • 207
              • 17,249

              #7
              Id move tyson up a bit and Put Sugar in first and Ali second but thats just me Great watch thx.

              Comment

              • Vadrigar.
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2010
                • 8134
                • 517
                • 415
                • 20,350

                #8
                Originally posted by DannYankee09
                Id move tyson up a bit and Put Sugar in first and Ali second but thats just me Great watch thx.
                yes some of the ratings seem out of place.

                Comment

                • omarinbox
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 2280
                  • 72
                  • 108
                  • 3,035

                  #9
                  Would move Duran and Tyson up. Put Robinson at the top. Relegate Dempsey.

                  Jack Johnson?

                  What is a great boxer? Is it boxing ability?

                  He was a great brawler at the time. The best in the world and the biggest draw in his time. A serious bad boy with the court cases but the likes of Tyson, Tunney and Marciano were better heavyweight boxers.

                  Comment

                  • Vadrigar.
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 8134
                    • 517
                    • 415
                    • 20,350

                    #10
                    Originally posted by omarinbox
                    Would move Duran and Tyson up. Put Robinson at the top. Relegate Dempsey.

                    Jack Johnson?

                    What is a great boxer? Is it boxing ability?

                    He was a great brawler at the time. The best in the world and the biggest draw in his time. A serious bad boy with the court cases but the likes of Tyson, Tunney and Marciano were better heavyweight boxers.
                    I think the video takes into account many factors, not just boxing ability.

                    I think it is clear that the video Is not a p4p list.
                    Last edited by Vadrigar.; 06-04-2010, 03:01 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP