Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Willing To Meet Mayweather's 14-Day Number

[IMDAZED]

Link to one interview in which he said that in so many words.

What do you mean "in so many words?" Don't we have brains? Can't we infer?

Here is his statement: http://pacman.craveonline.com/articl...iao-12-26-2009

Now FOR THE LAST TIME (since for some reason you are desperately avoiding this) when did a few days equal 24? And here's the kicker: Why was 14 days too close before? Was he lying then? Or is he lying now?

Explain away.

[IMDAZED]

ok, good ****. shut me the **** as far as him being scared of needles. i heard about that **** but i never seen any video of him sayin this after the morales lost. im gonna send you good 'ol green k for that 1. all ya *****s need 2 check son right here **** out if ya havent seen this b4.

Nobody cares because that reason isn't even as bad as the reason Manny gave on Jimmy Kimmel.

NO MORE EXCUSES.

If Manny is all of a sudden not weakened by blood tests, then he should take full, uncompromised testing. Why half-ass OST? Either do it or don't.

[King Ju-Ju]

Nobody cares because that reason isn't even as bad as the reason Manny gave on Jimmy Kimmel.

NO MORE EXCUSES.

If Manny is all of a sudden not weakened by blood tests, then he should take full, uncompromised testing. Why half-ass OST? Either do it or don't.

even if he never felt weak after taking blood, why does mayweather get 2 change the rules of the sport NOW after 40 pro fights? mosley did it cuz he was desperate. he would have EATEN **** IF FLOYD WANTED HIM 2.

[IMDAZED]

even if he never felt weak after taking blood, why does mayweather get 2 change the rules of the sport NOW after 40 pro fights? mosley did it cuz he was desperate. he would have EATEN **** IF FLOYD WANTED HIM 2.

Mayweather is not changing the rules. The rules aren't any different on May 2nd then they were on the 1st.

You know what kills me? People saying Floyd is trying to change the rules when - in the SAME negotiations - Pacquiao ignored NSAC rules and requested a 10m penalty. In other words, he doesn't give a **** about the rules either so why are we pretending they matter?

[check hook]

Why are you resorting to misquoting people? If you have to resort to that low tactic, it means you know you don't have an argument.

i'm not misquoting you fool.....you are lying again........


http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...73#post8431273


post 418



here....

Originally Posted by Dave Rado
They both killed the fight in the first negotiations and are both to blame. Floyd could have made the fight if he'd agreed to 24 days, Pac could have made the fight if he'd agreed to 14 days. Anyone who blames just one fighter for the negotiations breaking down before is nothing more than a fanboy.

24 days was regarded as reasonable by most PED experts.

Plus the 14 day offer was not made during the negotiations, it was made after the negotiations had already broken down. By that time, Pac was too angry about the smear campaign to be willing to compromise any further and in effect, threw his toys out of the pram. I don't defend him for doing that, but it was certainly no worse than what Floyd did. They were both to blame.

And killing the fight now would be far more far-reaching and far worse for boxing than killing the fight in the first negotiations, because after the first negotiations broke down, it was generally expected that the fight could still be made later this year. If the fight is killed now, that will almost certainly be the end of any hope of it ever happening.

so you knew you were lying when you said this, and now you are trying to lie and tell me you didn't......

[FLY TY]

even if he never felt weak after taking blood, why does mayweather get 2 change the rules of the sport NOW after 40 pro fights? mosley did it cuz he was desperate. he would have EATEN **** IF FLOYD WANTED HIM 2.

in boxing, fighters have a right to ask for stipulations in the contract. it's not "changing rules," its called negotiating.


weak argument.


it's no different than pacquiao demanding cotto fight him, and defend his 147 lb. belt, at 145......


it's no different than pacquiao demanding cotto defend his 154 lb. belt (if he beats foreman) at 150......


but it's called "negotiating" when manny does it, it's "changing the rules" when floyd does it.....

[IMDAZED]

i'm not misquoting you fool.....you are lying again........


http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...73#post8431273


post 418



here....






so you knew you were lying when you said this, and now you are trying to lie and tell me you didn't......

He'll tell you that's not exactly what he said, therefore you're lying.

[check hook]

so who are these PED experts that said 24 days was reasonable????

[Dave Rado]

What do you mean "in so many words?" Don't we have brains? Can't we infer?

Here is his statement: http://pacman.craveonline.com/articl...iao-12-26-2009

If you infer you're not being objective, you're expressing a subjective opinion. He said a few days in the link you gave. It's obvious that the reason he wouldn't go lower than 24 at that time wasn't that he really thought "a few" = 24 (your inference), but that he wasn't willing to take his orders from Mayweather. Pretty well every serious journalist I've read on the subject agrees with me about that inference and disagrees with you.

Now FOR THE LAST TIME (since for some reason you are desperately avoiding this) when did a few days equal 24?

That's your inference.

And here's the kicker: Why was 14 days too close before? Was he lying then? Or is he lying now?

Explain away.

You're being ridiculous by claiming he was lying on either occasion.

[check hook]

He'll tell you that's not exactly what he said, therefore you're lying.

ofcourse he will.........but the implication of what he said is clear.........