Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Willing To Meet Mayweather's 14-Day Number

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dave Rado
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 8064
    • 266
    • 453
    • 14,460

    #521
    Originally posted by IMDAZED
    Why would it take you hours?
    Because if you search for "pacquiao mayweather 24 day steroid" you get 153,000 search results, and I'm not going to spend my time hunting through 153,000 articles to find the ones I read last December or January.

    Comment

    • check hook
      Gay Pride
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 9361
      • 379
      • 137
      • 16,005

      #522
      Originally posted by IMDAZED
      Why would it take you hours? What do you mean "at that time?" Did these PED experts change their mind? The bottom line is that NO PED expert has ever said that. So - like Manny - either you are lying or misinformed, which is it?

      I repeat, NO "PED Expert" ever said that. None. You said most experts and now it'll take you hours to find something? Hours? Try forever.


      lying for sure........there is no way he is misinformed........that can't be used as an excuse....i've posted zillions of educational threads re PED......in which the real experts voiced their opinions....no the imaginary experts Dave is talking about.

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #523
        Originally posted by Dave Rado
        Because if you search for "pacquiao mayweather 24 day steroid" you get 153,000 search results, and I'm not going to spend my time hunting through 153,000 articles to find the ones I read last December or January.
        Why would you need to type that in? Let me ask you something...can you name...

        ONE PED Expert? Just one?

        Comment

        • check hook
          Gay Pride
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2010
          • 9361
          • 379
          • 137
          • 16,005

          #524
          Originally posted by mesher
          What Dave is saying is correct, the reason steroid testing hasn't been so big in boxing is because the common belief is that steroids and the extra bulk they produce actually "hinder" a boxer's performance, they make the muscles tight and rigged. I mean, look at Shane, Vargas etc, did they perform exceptionally well while on steroids??? If anything it may have had a total negative impact on their careers in the long run.


          steroids don't produce extra bulk unless you train to achieve extra bulk....you are right about the tightness though.....but that is all a timing issue.......

          either way....what i want to know is this.....is EPO beneficial to a boxers performance???? i would say that is a resounding YES......


          does the NSAC or any other commission test for EPO?? the answer is NO!!!

          Comment

          • IMDAZED
            Fair but Firm
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2006
            • 42644
            • 1,134
            • 1,770
            • 67,152

            #525
            Originally posted by check hook
            lying for sure........there is no way he is misinformed........that can't be used as an excuse....i've posted zillions of educational threads re PED......in which the real experts voiced their opinions....no the imaginary experts Dave is talking about.
            Obviously. But I'm giving him a pass - just like he's giving Manny a pass . Hey, maybe he read some articles from the Pinoy Lounge and really thought they were by PED Experts. That's why I'm asking if he knows one. Just one.

            Comment

            • Bee Keepz
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2010
              • 1872
              • 67
              • 0
              • 8,119

              #526


              I call this ***** self-ownage.

              Travis Tygart:

              A: "The human growth hormone for sure, levels of testosterone, and other designer steroids. Sounds like you've got some information -- I'm not agreeing factually that was the difference, and I'm not disagreeing. But if that's the case, the other piece is that, prior to that 14-day or 24-day blackout period, what system was in place? Were you just using the Nevada, or the state of California, system? If that's the case, I'm not worried about the 14-day or the 24-day blackout period, I'm worried about the rest of it. If someone's telling you that's where it fell apart, I think you've got to add the follow-up, 'Well, what kind of testing was going to happen before the 14-day or the 24-day blackout period?' The 14-day period, I'm a lot less concerned about that than what you're doing in the two months before that 14-day period."

              http://www.mlive.com/mayweather/inde...current_d.html

              Comment

              • scarhead
                Contender
                • Jul 2008
                • 330
                • 24
                • 0
                • 6,393

                #527
                Originally posted by check hook
                steroids don't produce extra bulk unless you train to achieve extra bulk....you are right about the tightness though.....but that is all a timing issue.......

                either way....what i want to know is this.....is EPO beneficial to a boxers performance???? i would say that is a resounding YES......


                does the NSAC or any other commission test for EPO?? the answer is NO!!!
                Man, Pacquiao fans do not understand you when you say "The NSAC does not test for EPO". They will answer with some dumb crap like "Uh, Manny has passed all the tests, he doesn't use EPO".

                Comment

                • IMDAZED
                  Fair but Firm
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 42644
                  • 1,134
                  • 1,770
                  • 67,152

                  #528
                  Originally posted by Bee Keepz


                  I call this ***** self-ownage.
                  **Yawn**

                  Only you could read that and think it's self-ownage.

                  Comment

                  • IMDAZED
                    Fair but Firm
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2006
                    • 42644
                    • 1,134
                    • 1,770
                    • 67,152

                    #529
                    Originally posted by scarhead
                    Man, Pacquiao fans do not understand you when you say "The NSAC does not test for EPO". They will answer with some dumb crap like "Uh, Manny has passed all the tests, he doesn't use EPO".
                    It's hard to tell if they're really that ****** or if they're playing ******. They do a good job of imitating their idol.

                    Comment

                    • Bee Keepz
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 1872
                      • 67
                      • 0
                      • 8,119

                      #530
                      Originally posted by IMDAZED
                      **Yawn**

                      Only you could read that and think it's self-ownage.


                      Isn't that your boy, Travis Tagyrt? Isn't this Floyd's expert? Seems weird that he isn't concerned about those final days, but the actual 2 months prior to that.

                      Travis Tygart:

                      A: "The human growth hormone for sure, levels of testosterone, and other designer steroids. Sounds like you've got some information -- I'm not agreeing factually that was the difference, and I'm not disagreeing. But if that's the case, the other piece is that, prior to that 14-day or 24-day blackout period, what system was in place? Were you just using the Nevada, or the state of California, system? If that's the case, I'm not worried about the 14-day or the 24-day blackout period, I'm worried about the rest of it. If someone's telling you that's where it fell apart, I think you've got to add the follow-up, 'Well, what kind of testing was going to happen before the 14-day or the 24-day blackout period?' The 14-day period, I'm a lot less concerned about that than what you're doing in the two months before that 14-day period."

                      http://www.mlive.com/mayweather/inde...current_d.html

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP