I don't think Wladimir's 2000-2003 title claim should be considered equal to Lewis, who had been avoided by Bowe, thus given the vacanted WBC heavyweight title, and side-stepped by Tyson, thus given the vacanted WBC title again. In Wladimir's case he hardly has a case to having been a legitimate champion because he went onto be knocked out by Sanders before having a chance to fight Lewis.
Of course most people probably look at it using hindsight, with the WBO given recognition as a legitimate title now, but back in the 1990's nobody recognized the likes of Damiani and Hide as legitimate title holders.
I see, so according to you Calzaghe was not a champion when he held the WBO title, and so didn't have 21 defenses as supermiddleweight champion, right?
Comment