ummm..... mosley didn't become available 'til the earthquake. he was signed for berto remember?
u also remember roachs statement : "mosley is too dangerous, if he comes down to 143 then we will fight him" ?
while mayweather was also not available back then.
so who in your opinion should have mosley fight?
a 20years old prospect or some bum to stay active?
if pacquiao really wanted to be #1 WW, he would have fought mosley.
u dont get #1 by taking shortcuts.
u also remember roachs statement : "mosley is too dangerous, if he comes down to 143 then we will fight him" ?
while mayweather was also not available back then.
so who in your opinion should have mosley fight?
a 20years old prospect or some bum to stay active?
if pacquiao really wanted to be #1 WW, he would have fought mosley.
u dont get #1 by taking shortcuts.
i don't give a **** what roach says. mosley was not available to fight march 13. he was available for november though but they chose cotto.
there are shortcuts to #1. hell floyd took a shortcut to the lineal title didn't he?
a hardcore fanboy would realize the ring magazine gave him #1 BEFORE the clottey fight.
mayweather hasn't fought and mosley hasn't fought since then.
him winning by UD cost him to drop?
****** hun.
u wrote the winner will be #1 at ww PROBABLY, i have responded to that.
i was trying to say that u extremely overrate his win against clottey.
but if u dont know what to do next, put words in my mouth, np.
Comment