Why is BHop DUCKING Winky?

**as214** · 05-24-2005, 02:23 PM

Originally posted by TRUEVisionDC

Ok. this has become painfully obvious. Su****ion #1 He chose to fight a relatively unknown in Taylor...fine. Taylor is an up and comer. Then he says he was going to fight Tito for 8 figures (which would have happened had Tito won). Why didnt he ever say I want the WINNER of Tito/Winky fight?? Su****ion #2.

Now he says there is "not enough money" in a Winky Wright bout. Yeah right!! Who wouldnt want to see that. Of course it would be a snoozefest but so what.!.!.! Are you kidding me? What am I missing? If it looks like a DUCK"ing", quacks like a "DUCK"ing, then it must be, right?!?!?!

If he loses to Winky his legacy is ******.. He plans on retiring without losing again

**ottoevans** · 05-24-2005, 02:25 PM

if he fights Winky there wont be any money in that. The man is 40 why would he fight sumone that wont pay him.

**TRUEVisionDC** · 05-24-2005, 02:26 PM

Originally posted by as214

If he loses to Winky his legacy is ******.. He plans on retiring without losing again

But thats Bull****!!. I dont think Tito's legacy is f*ked. He fought the ppl that needed to be fought right??

**spinksjinx** · 05-24-2005, 02:29 PM

His legacy would be ruined, Hopkins is looking for a few challenges he can overcome without losing.

**spinksjinx** · 05-24-2005, 02:30 PM

Originally posted by TRUEVisionDC

But thats Bull****!!. I dont think Tito's legacy is f*ked. He fought the ppl that needed to be fought right??

Hopkins isnt a fan favorite and the only thing that keeps the crowd interested is I am 40 and undefeated for 10 years and defended my title 20+ times.

**as214** · 05-24-2005, 02:31 PM

That money excuse is bull****.. There is definetly more money in a Winky-Bhop fight than Bhop-Taylor fight.. Someone is ducking someone and it aint Winky duckin BHop!!

**abdiel2k3** · 05-24-2005, 02:33 PM

Originally posted by TRUEVisionDC

Ok. this has become painfully obvious. Su****ion #1 He chose to fight a relatively unknown in Taylor...fine. Taylor is an up and comer. Then he says he was going to fight Tito for 8 figures (which would have happened had Tito won). Why didnt he ever say I want the WINNER of Tito/Winky fight?? Su****ion #2.

Now he says there is "not enough money" in a Winky Wright bout. Yeah right!! Who wouldnt want to see that. Of course it would be a snoozefest but so what.!.!.! Are you kidding me? What am I missing? If it looks like a DUCK"ing", quacks like a "DUCK"ing, then it must be, right?!?!?!

LMAO
are u ******ed?
how can u avoid someone who had bealry entered ur wieght class
as far as chosen tayor over tito or winky
dumbass
both fight were sceduled around the same time
i doubt hopkins is "ducking" winky
ya hes a threat to lose a boring ass one sided fight
but so is hopkins
plus hes naturaly the bigger guy
a legit 160lb fighter
not like tito a 154 guy fighten at 160

**spinksjinx** · 05-24-2005, 02:34 PM

Originally posted by as214

That money excuse is bull****.. There is definetly more money in a Winky-Bhop fight than Bhop-Taylor fight.. Someone is ducking someone and it aint Winky duckin BHop!!

I believe there is more money in him fighting Taylor. HBO is bed buddies with Dibella and Oscar, for a fight like this they will throw the money down hard because they dont want to lose their boxing meal tickets. HBO is heavily relying on Taylor to be the next middleweight champion and thrashing Hopkins, which is why they will throw more money down as Taylor is an exciting fighter and a house favorite.

**manila_assasin** · 05-24-2005, 02:36 PM

What i don't understand is. Why isn't there any money on a WINKY fight? Hasn't the guy proven himself enough yet?

Why is BHop DUCKING Winky?