i want to try something.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

you ask for a logical boxing thread yet you make a biased (hate) thread about Pacquiao.

"Barrera lost a lopsided decision to Marquez" that's BS, as is a lot of other exaggerations you made. There is nothing logical about this thread whatsoever you are just trying to look for ways to discredit every one of Pacquiaos wins.

[immortal tech]

No, you!!!! Either Miguel Cotto or Antonio Margarito are the best WWs of this decade

you know Cotto was a Jr WW most of the decade right?

[disolly]

okay you make a lot of good points. and you're right about barerra and morales but manny was also the first to ko those two great fighters. and he was much more one dimensional at that time and in morales 1 he had to wear winnings which is brutal for a ko puncher.
i personally believe the great thing about manny is the style in which he beats his opponents, he destroys them. and this is boxing unless you are fighting an undefeated, proven fighter than there is always ways to discredit the opponent after the fight. another thing that people find amazing about manny is that he was fighting at 130 a couple years ago. back than no one thought it was possible for him to be competing in the WW division. and guys like david diaz werent great by any means but he was a good, solid top 10 lightweight and manny destroyed him. and oscar was a money fight and oscar was badly weight drained but manny was also moving up from 135 to 147 in the fight which is very rare to see.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

you know Cotto was a Jr WW most of the decade right?

Do you know that he fought every top WW in his time but one? Im wondering who was it?

[immortal tech]

Do you know that he fought every top WW in his time but one? Im wondering who was it?

big names he fought at WW is SSM, Margarito, Clottey and Pacquiao tell me how he looked in those fights

[tesla_power]

There are 2 prime P4P opponent in the win column of Pac resume , MAB1 and JMM2. MAB1 win > JMM2 win IMO.

[boxer2k5]

OK, Ill play your game then !!


Corrales - He was weight drain even during the fight the announcers where saying Corrales requested the fight to be at 135, because he could no longer make 130 healthy

Castillo - Beat Floyd once, lost once.

Gatti - Was shot to ****

Hatton - he fought him at 147, where Hatton wasnt at his best weight.

DLH - Old past prime

JMM - old and small LW and he fought him at 142. in wich he didnt even made the weight.


So FLoyds best wins are judah and Baldomir

i said oscar was past his prime but at least floyd fought him with all oscar demands. manny fought way past prime oscar plus weight drained.

and to say castillo won 1 and lost one thats not facts thats opinion.
if you say that then you can make a case that manny lost to JMM twice.
but on paper on record he didnt.

and thats bull**** about corrales i watched that fight so many times they never mentioned that bull****. and if he couldnt make weight why was diego still campaigning at super feather for the next 3 years? why wasnt he at lightweight if he couldnt make the super feather limit?

i know gatti was shot or w.e thats why i said nothing much to say here because everyone knows that

[Spray_resistant]

Well cong**** TS in making a thread that seems to have progressed in an unbiased and flame free manner.

[boxer2k5]

you ask for a logical boxing thread yet you make a biased (hate) thread about Pacquiao.

"Barrera lost a lopsided decision to Marquez" that's BS, as is a lot of other exaggerations you made. There is nothing logical about this thread whatsoever you are just trying to look for ways to discredit every one of Pacquiaos wins.

theres no hate and im not biased you tell me all pac big wins against the biggest names were all in their primes?

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

big names he fought at WW is SSM, Margarito, Clottey and Pacquiao tell me how he looked in those fights

Quintana
Judah
Mosley
Margarito
Clottey
Pacquiao


What name is missing on that list?