Mosley has a better resume then Floyd because he lost to Winky and Vernon?

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

exactly my point, see post #43. Burner is just trying to take one sentence where I condensed my thoughs because he couldn't get his mind around what a resume is. Typical burner move. It could be done to anyone but no one would embarass themselves like burner. He's too dumb to know it. He thinks only your wins count on your resume.

Im right. Only your wins are your resume. You dont get credit for getting your ass beat as something good.

Hell if thats the case Oscar is the GOAT. You cant just sign to fight everybiody and keep getting your ass beat, Dont make me dig deep on this ****. Ill go grab some journey men with ATG's on their record.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Thomas Hearns lost twice to Iran Barkley. So Floyd has better resume than Hearns since he lost to one dimensional fighter, right?

No. Hearns has a better resume because he is an 8 time world Champ in 6 different weight classes. With wins over Benitez, Hill, Duran and Cuevas.

Your resume is your wins.

But using yall logic I can add Leonard and Hagler to the list of Hearns resume.

Do you get it now?

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

I rate it like this.

Resumes are a fighters best wins, good wins,etc.

There level of competition is the level of fighters they fought throughout their careers.

For example:

Mayweathers resume
Diego Corrales
Oscar De La Hoya
Jose luis Castillo x2
Ricky Hatton
Arturo Gatti
Zab Judah
Genaro Hernandez

(not in any particular order)

Other notable wins are Carlos Baldomir, Jesus Chavez, DeMarcus Corley.


Mosley's resume
Oscar De La Hoya x2
Antonio Margarito
Fernando Vargas x2
Ricardo Mayorga
Luis Collazo

(not in any particular order)

There's probably a few more notable fighters in there also.

There resumes are closer than what alot of people think. I actually give Floyd a slight edge at the moment.

Now....The level of competition goes to Mosley hands down.

All the fighters i named above on Floyds resume are the best fighters he's fought and because he's never lost there are no big fights i left out.

Mosley however has lost to the likes of Forrest, Wright and Cotto which easily push Mosley ahead ( combined with the fighters i mentioned above on his resume) in the level of competition catergory.

resume means a fighters wins

record is wins and losses together

Thank you. This is what I been trying to tell these guys.

[check hook]

actually shane resume is not better than pacquaio. he has the better welterweight resume but don't act like erik morrales, barrera, marquez and cotto aren't resume worthy.

- Prime ODLH (twice)
- Mayorga
- Vargas (twice)
- Prime Winky (twice)
- Prime Forrest (twice)
- Miguel Cotto
- Floyd Mayweather Jr
- Callazo
- Margarito

And thats only at 147 and 154.........if i remember right he was undefeated at 135.....with 30 plus fights.....

so seriously STFU and stop hugging Pac nuts.....you don't hear me saying Floyds resume is better than Shanes......because it's not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

- Prime ODLH (twice)
- Mayorga
- Vargas (twice)
- Prime Winky (twice)
- Prime Forrest (twice)
- Miguel Cotto
- Floyd Mayweather Jr
- Callazo
- Margarito

And thats only at 147 and 154.........if i remember right he was undefeated at 135.....with 30 plus fights.....

so seriously STFU and stop hugging Pac nuts.....you don't hear me saying Floyds resume is better than Shanes......because it's not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Resume is YOUR wins. Pac has a better resume then Oscar. Oscar best win is what again?

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

you got it twisted mate..

in modern era, odlh have the greatest "resume"..
his "record" is not that great though..

So Andy Koelle has a better resume then Amir Khan? I mean he did fight Paul Williams and Andre Ward.

[Walt Liquor]

You are so full of **** you just said the other day that Floyd SHOULDNT get credit for fighting Mosley because thats whats he SUPPOSE to be doing. I mean cut the ****....lol.

that's what he's posed to be doing. I've said numerous times that Floyd will get a ton of credit from me if he beats Shane. I'm picking Shane for christs sake. And I've never picked against Floyd before, not once. Most recently I said Floyd is atg if he beats Shane and moreso if he beats PAC and shane. When he came back with the 5 fight plan, I said a number of times on here that if he cleans out ww, he is the man. I also ate crow and gave Floyd his props for being the biggest draw in boxing after he sold a mil for the jmm fight. U don't hate Floyd, I hate ******ed floyd ballhuggers like you. I like fighters who back up what they say and it appears Floyd is on his way towards doing that.

It is a fact that Floyd had no one to fight until berto pulled out of the shane
fight.

[bojangles1987]

Great so by your logic Andy Koelle has a better resume then Amir Khan right. I mean he did fight Williams and Ward.

Yes, because Amir Khan has no one on his resume that can compare to Paul Williams and Andre Ward. The point you are missing is that resume does not define how good a fighter is, just the level of competition they have fought.

Seriously, how do you not understand this? Resume is the level of competition a fighter has fought at, it is just one factor of where a fighter ranks. A better resume does not mean one fighter is better than another fighter.

You also keep saying going by resume Oscar is the GOAT. NO! Oscar has not fought better competition than anyone ever all time, he just has a very impressive level of competition, that's his RESUME.

[check hook]

Resume is YOUR wins. Pac has a better resume then Oscar. Oscar best win is what again?

If you go by wins Floyd and Shane are more even....considering Shane lost to Wright and VF both times, lost to Cotto and arguably lost to Oscar second time..........but Floyd absolutely must beat Shane in May........

[krispy kreme]

I would think your resume is your wins and losses as it represents your entire professional career. Saying that losses is not part of the resume, seems like you're disregarding the effort a fighter put into the preparation and the pain they've endured in that fight.