Mosley has a better resume then Floyd because he lost to Winky and Vernon?

[Walt Liquor]

Thats not what the argument was. 4 fighters isnt a whole resume. Dude said Forrest and Winky **** on Floyds whole resume as if Shane actually won those fights. That was my beef. That argument is flawed on so many levels. In boxing just fighjting the best doesnt get you style points almost doesnt count. You have to win. Which is why JMM is obsessed with Pac he could give a **** ass about a close loss he wants to win.

Burner you are really annoying. I explained myself 5 times, read my fn post. You really are too dumb to understand. You don't know what a resume is. Read post 43. I only wrote those exact words because you couldn't understand what a resume is and said floyd's was way better for all kinds of ridiculous reasons (in those reasons was him going up to 154 to best Oscar, his floyd's win v corrales, and floyds win v genero). I was responding that if you think that's floyds resume, than that part of shane's resumes shi t on those fights). My god dude, I feel really sorry for you. You pick a sentence out of a discussion and after it's explained many times, you still don't get it and keep typing the same thng over and over.

I feel sorry for lee van cleef.

[Walt Liquor]

These idiots that are putting that a resume only includes wins are utterly brainless.

Should hearns get not credit for fighting hagler?

How about Oscar for fighting tito?

What about dirrel for fighting froch?

Glenn Johnson gets no props for fighting Dawson and all of his other top loses.

Meldrick Taylor gets nothing for his performance v Chavez

sweet pea gets nothing for fighting Oscar.
Ricky hatton no credit for stepping to Floyd.

Zab for any time he ever fought a world class fighter.

Forrest for fighting mayora and having the balls to rematch.

Ali for facing holmes.

Tito for fighting prime bhop and Oscar.

[Walt Liquor]

I don't understand the argument in this thread. Yes, there is a difference between resume and record. Guys like Jermain Taylor do have really good resumes. If you wonder where the losses fit then, they fit in when talking about RECORD and where that record puts that fighter when talking about their career.

Oscar had a great resume, but since he lost like half his big fights he it is reflected in where you would place him when talking about the best ever. Jermain Taylor has a really good resume, but since he has lost so many fights by KO you don't talk about him as being one of the best ever.

How is that hard to understand? Pac has a great resume, and is talked about so highly because he has won so many of the big fights. Ali has one of the best resumes of all time, and is considered arguably the greatest be
cause he won almost all of them.

exactly my point, see post #43. Burner is just trying to take one sentence where I condensed my thoughs because he couldn't get his mind around what a resume is. Typical burner move. It could be done to anyone but no one would embarass themselves like burner. He's too dumb to know it. He thinks only your wins count on your resume.

[bojangles1987]

exactly my point, see post #43. Burner is just trying to take one sentence where I condensed my thoughs because he couldn't get his mind around what a resume is. Typical burner move. It could be done to anyone but no one would embarass themselves like burner. He's too dumb to know it. He thinks only your wins count on your resume.

I'm with you, it's why I felt like commenting. This is ridiculous.

[yeks]

resume means a fighters wins

record is wins and losses together

you got it twisted mate..

in modern era, odlh have the greatest "resume"..
his "record" is not that great though..

[victorythagr8]

mosleys resume is greater than Pac and Floyds resume easily.....seriously!!!!!!

actually shane resume is not better than pacquaio. he has the better welterweight resume but don't act like erik morrales, barrera, marquez and cotto aren't resume worthy.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

I rate it like this.

Resumes are a fighters best wins, good wins,etc.

There level of competition is the level of fighters they fought throughout their careers.

For example:

Mayweathers resume
Diego Corrales
Oscar De La Hoya
Jose luis Castillo x2
Ricky Hatton
Arturo Gatti
Zab Judah
Genaro Hernandez

(not in any particular order)

Other notable wins are Carlos Baldomir, Jesus Chavez, DeMarcus Corley.


Mosley's resume
Oscar De La Hoya x2
Antonio Margarito
Fernando Vargas x2
Ricardo Mayorga
Luis Collazo

(not in any particular order)

There's probably a few more notable fighters in there also.

There resumes are closer than what alot of people think. I actually give Floyd a slight edge at the moment.

Now....The level of competition goes to Mosley hands down.

All the fighters i named above on Floyds resume are the best fighters he's fought and because he's never lost there are no big fights i left out.

Mosley however has lost to the likes of Forrest, Wright and Cotto which easily push Mosley ahead ( combined with the fighters i mentioned above on his resume) in the level of competition catergory.

Exactly if people want to see Shane fought better fighters. Fine. But he does not thave the better resume.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Why remove the 154 lb fights? That's part of what makes Shane who he is. He was small for the weight but still chased people there. That was when he only threw on or two punches at a time, like Floyd now. That's what makes shanes's resume better than floyds. It's not like Floyd didn't fight at 154 once so it's a perfectly good question. You
only want to drop shane's time at 154 cuz you know that's at least 2 more l's for Floyd (another reason why shane's resume is better, cuz you know Floyd would have a worse record than Shane does not if he had fought shane's opponents). You are so transparent burner. Transparent means we can see right through you and can tell why you make up all the little excuses that you do.

Man Shane was knocking people out at 154. Cut the ****. Dude you are really ****ing dense. Floyd is not a 154 Pounder. So because I dont think Floyd would go 7-0 at 154 Pounds that means his resume is better. I can easily say well call me when Shane is on his 5th weight class like Floyd. See what I did there. In other words call me when he wins a title at 168.

Resume is your wins.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

These idiots that are putting that a resume only includes wins are utterly brainless.

Should hearns get not credit for fighting hagler?

How about Oscar for fighting tito?

What about dirrel for fighting froch?

Glenn Johnson gets no props for fighting Dawson and all of his other top loses.

Meldrick Taylor gets nothing for his performance v Chavez

sweet pea gets nothing for fighting Oscar.
Ricky hatton no credit for stepping to Floyd.

Zab for any time he ever fought a world class fighter.

Forrest for fighting mayora and having the balls to rematch.

Ali for facing holmes.

Tito for fighting prime bhop and Oscar.

You are so full of **** you just said the other day that Floyd SHOULDNT get credit for fighting Mosley because thats whats he SUPPOSE to be doing. I mean cut the ****....lol.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

I'm with you, it's why I felt like commenting. This is ridiculous.

Great so by your logic Andy Koelle has a better resume then Amir Khan right. I mean he did fight Williams and Ward.