Mosley has a better resume then Floyd because he lost to Winky and Vernon?

[krispy kreme]

I would think your resume is your wins and losses as it represents your entire professional career. Saying that losses is not part of the resume, seems like you're disregarding the effort a fighter put into the preparation and the pain they've endured in that fight...

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Yes, because Amir Khan has no one on his resume that can compare to Paul Williams and Andre Ward. The point you are missing is that resume does not define how good a fighter is, just the level of competition they have fought.

Seriously, how do you not understand this? Resume is the level of competition a fighter has fought at, it is just one factor of where a fighter ranks. A better resume does not mean one fighter is better than another fighter.

You also keep saying going by resume Oscar is the GOAT. NO! Oscar has not fought better competition than anyone ever all time, he just has a very impressive level of competition, that's his RESUME.

So you agree that Emmanuel Burton has a better resume then Calzaghe.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Yes, because Amir Khan has no one on his resume that can compare to Paul Williams and Andre Ward. The point you are missing is that resume does not define how good a fighter is, just the level of competition they have fought.

Seriously, how do you not understand this? Resume is the level of competition a fighter has fought at, it is just one factor of where a fighter ranks. A better resume does not mean one fighter is better than another fighter.

You also keep saying going by resume Oscar is the GOAT. NO! Oscar has not fought better competition than anyone ever all time, he just has a very impressive level of competition, that's his RESUME.

I rate it like this.

Resumes are a fighters best wins, good wins,etc.

There level of competition is the level of fighters they fought throughout their careers.

For example:

Mayweathers resume
Diego Corrales
Oscar De La Hoya
Jose luis Castillo x2
Ricky Hatton
Arturo Gatti
Zab Judah
Genaro Hernandez

(not in any particular order)

Other notable wins are Carlos Baldomir, Jesus Chavez, DeMarcus Corley.


Mosley's resume
Oscar De La Hoya x2
Antonio Margarito
Fernando Vargas x2
Ricardo Mayorga
Luis Collazo

(not in any particular order)

There's probably a few more notable fighters in there also.

There resumes are closer than what alot of people think. I actually give Floyd a slight edge at the moment.

Now....The level of competition goes to Mosley hands down.

All the fighters i named above on Floyds resume are the best fighters he's fought and because he's never lost there are no big fights i left out.

Mosley however has lost to the likes of Forrest, Wright and Cotto which easily push Mosley ahead ( combined with the fighters i mentioned above on his resume) in the level of competition catergory.

Your comments on this.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

that's what he's posed to be doing. I've said numerous times that Floyd will get a ton of credit from me if he beats Shane. I'm picking Shane for christs sake. And I've never picked against Floyd before, not once. Most recently I said Floyd is atg if he beats Shane and moreso if he beats PAC and shane. When he came back with the 5 fight plan, I said a number of times on here that if he cleans out ww, he is the man. I also ate crow and gave Floyd his props for being the biggest draw in boxing after he sold a mil for the jmm fight. U don't hate Floyd, I hate ******ed floyd ballhuggers like you. I like fighters who back up what they say and it appears Floyd is on his way towards doing that.

It is a fact that Floyd had no one to fight until berto pulled out of the shane
fight.

Ok whats the point of that statement?

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Resume= Wins.

[bojangles1987]

So you agree that Emmanuel Burton has a better resume then Calzaghe.

Not really, there more comparable. Calzaghe has some good names, and Burton has some good names. Again, it has NOTHING to do with who is better, just the level of competition they fought.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Not really, there more comparable. Calzaghe has some good names, and Burton has some good names. Again, it has NOTHING to do with who is better, just the level of competition they fought.

You just made my point homie. There records arent comparable Burton fought a 135 Pound Mayweather. Who on Calzaghes resume compares to that? Using yall logic? Shane has fought the better competition. No one denied that. But when you say his resume is better then Floyd because he lost 4 fights to Winky and Forrest that makes no sense.

[krispy kreme]

Not really, there more comparable. Calzaghe has some good names, and Burton has some good names. Again, it has NOTHING to do with who is better, just the level of competition they fought.

My thoughts as well, and Mayweather would not get into the ring with Wright or Forrest.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

My thoughts as well, and Mayweather would not get into the ring with Wright or Forrest.

Shane will not win a title in a 5th weight class.

[Walt Liquor]

Ok whats the point of that statement?

burner, i put what your resume is in post #43. to shorten it up a little.

stop doing your ridiculous andy kolle remark, it makes no freaking sense.

a) your record
b) your competition
c) your longevity

a resume is your entire body of work, just like in real life.

by the way, you should go on a diet...YOU ARE OBESE BURNER, A FAT PILE OF SHI T

http://www.jodohonline.com/dietpills/obesity_chart.htm