I understand what Dirk is trying to say. P4P lists should be primarily based on skills in my eyes ('skills' meaning how you think they would fare against their peers in hypothetical match-ups where weight and size aren't an issue) but that is obviously unavoidably tied in with recent résumé, as afterall, how can you truly gauge how good a boxer's skills are unless he's fought worthy opposition in the first place?
That said I think Paul is better than Hopkins currently and would beat him were they the same size.
That said I think Paul is better than Hopkins currently and would beat him were they the same size.
Comment