If Floyd Followed Pacquiao's Route To Greatness...

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • M.I.C.
    Undisputed Champion
    • Mar 2008
    • 3344
    • 193
    • 0
    • 9,683

    #91
    Originally posted by daggum
    so if chad dawson beats pac does that mean anything cause pacs number 1? would you say hey pac doesnt belong at that weight class or wow! he beat the p4p number 1 that is great! is that a much better win than fighting someone in his division like pascal or hopkins? please answer so i confirm you're either ****** or a hypocrite.
    P4P fighters move up in weight, Marquez was P4P #2, Marquez wanted to fight the best, Floyd obliged, Pac ducked. What I saw in that fight was evidence that Floyd would be Marquez at any age, and at any weight. What I saw with Floyd vs Oscar, Hatton, is that Floyd would beat them at any age any weight.

    Comment

    • M.I.C.
      Undisputed Champion
      • Mar 2008
      • 3344
      • 193
      • 0
      • 9,683

      #92
      Originally posted by Dirt
      ok, fine. floyd has a better resume than Pac. YET Pac's ATG status is STILL better. no matter how you flip it man, it ends up the same. LOL.
      He's an ATG based on judging him at a lower standard, yes.

      Comment

      • Dirt
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 671
        • 9
        • 0
        • 6,818

        #93
        Originally posted by M.I.C.
        P4P fighters move up in weight, Marquez was P4P #2, Marquez wanted to fight the best, Floyd obliged, Pac ducked. What I saw in that fight was evidence that Floyd would be Marquez at any age, and at any weight. What I saw with Floyd vs Oscar, Hatton, is that Floyd would beat them at any age any weight.
        Pac ducked Marquez? so he's supposed to keep fighting marquez until marquez beats him? until marquez fans are happy? until anti pac fans get what they want? LOL.

        Comment

        • M.I.C.
          Undisputed Champion
          • Mar 2008
          • 3344
          • 193
          • 0
          • 9,683

          #94
          Originally posted by bojangles1987
          Kermit Cintron was destroyed by Antonio Margarito. Clottey gave him a hell of a fight. Cintron is not a top 5 welter, Clottey is. Marquez was a lightweight, don't even bring him up like that fight with Mayweather was credible.
          I'll say this, I think Pac found the wrong replacement, I fully expect an upset on March 13. Either that, or Pac truly eats, Flat footed, slow, minimal movement fighters for breakfast.

          Comment

          • Dirt
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Nov 2009
            • 671
            • 9
            • 0
            • 6,818

            #95
            Originally posted by M.I.C.
            He's an ATG based on judging him at a lower standard, yes.
            so with that thinking, someone whose had no wins should be an ATG as well because he's held to an even lower standard. i gotcha.

            Comment

            • M.I.C.
              Undisputed Champion
              • Mar 2008
              • 3344
              • 193
              • 0
              • 9,683

              #96
              Originally posted by Dirt
              Pac ducked Marquez? so he's supposed to keep fighting marquez until marquez beats him? until marquez fans are happy? until anti pac fans get what they want? LOL.
              That seemed to be his philosophy vs Morales, they fought what was it, 3 times? Even after Morales was embarassed by Raheem, And what exactly was the purpose of a rematch with Barrera?

              Comment

              • Dirt
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Nov 2009
                • 671
                • 9
                • 0
                • 6,818

                #97
                Originally posted by M.I.C.
                I'll say this, I think Pac found the wrong replacement, I fully expect an upset on March 13. Either that, or Pac truly eats, Flat footed, slow, minimal movement fighters for breakfast.
                because before boxers fight pac, they're tough and worthy opponents. but when after pac fights them they're either weight drained, over the hill, too slow, too flat footed, and whatever else people say to discredit an opponent.

                Comment

                • M.I.C.
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 3344
                  • 193
                  • 0
                  • 9,683

                  #98
                  Originally posted by Dirt
                  so with that thinking, someone whose had no wins should be an ATG as well because he's held to an even lower standard. i gotcha.
                  If he was judged by Floyd's standards he would need to go up and fight Pavlik at 160, then enter the Super 6 tournament replacing Taylor. Then come back down in weight and fight 6'1 Paul Williams.

                  Comment

                  • M.I.C.
                    Undisputed Champion
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 3344
                    • 193
                    • 0
                    • 9,683

                    #99
                    Originally posted by Dirt
                    because before boxers fight pac, they're tough and worthy opponents. but when after pac fights them they're either weight drained, over the hill, too slow, too flat footed, and whatever else people say to discredit an opponent.
                    Well no, I already know Clottey is flat footed, stationary, and low punch output. He'll stand there and let Pac win a decision. Which is what everyone is hoping for actually. After all a knockout might be illogical considering his turtle shell defense.

                    Comment

                    • Dirt
                      Interim Champion
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 671
                      • 9
                      • 0
                      • 6,818

                      #100
                      Originally posted by M.I.C.
                      That seemed to be his philosophy vs Morales, they fought what was it, 3 times? Even after Morales was embarassed by Raheem, And what exactly was the purpose of a rematch with Barrera?
                      touche. but you can say the same thing about floyd/ judah/baldmir. why fight judah when he already lost to baldomir then go and fight baldomir afterwards?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP